LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > All P-08 Military Lugers

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-14-2012, 10:53 PM   #36
jags
User
 
jags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 32
Thanks: 4
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

I just got back from my FFL where I had a chance to really examine the barrel proofs. Because it has been buffed and reblued it is really hard to make out the proofs. I did get some more photos and, using photos of one of Don's Lugers, I have put together a comparitve analysis below.



Left Side Barrel Proofs:



Here we see a comparison. The top proof does look like it could be an E/36. The middle proof could be the top of the wings of the larger Eagle but what's below it is questionable.



Right Side Barrel Proof:



In this comparison you can definately see the faint traces of a proof there. It is in the correct location. It is possible that it is a PTV/E.


I did not get a photo of it but also stamped inside the frame but not on the lug is this same "oval N" as shown in Don's photo below. What was this proof?





I also want to note that, although the barrel/receiver has been reblued, the front of the barrel is worn to a very shinny metal. As if the tip of the barrel had been rubbing it's nose inside a holster for some time. Another mystery as if the barrel/receiver had been recently reblued as part of a restoration project, why would the barrel front be worn as if it had lived in a holster for a long time?


It's unfortunate that the barrel/reciever has been buffed and reblued which has caused the proofs to be so unreadable. I do believe that there is enough evidence to at least give some possibility that the barrel/reciever is a 1929 rework. We see that the barrel has been stamped with matching numbers to the reciever, the receiver is dated 1917 and has the "sight notch" of previously being a LP08, and it has been fitted with a safety sear. This along with the proofs that are there does point it to possibly being a 1929 rework.

I hope this additional info can help to get us a little closer to the truth.

Thanks again!
jags is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com