LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > All P-08 Military Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 04-26-2006, 03:34 PM   #21
Dwight Gruber
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,908
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,330 Times in 435 Posts
Default

E-Ed,

Pete is right on the money. Fwiw I have one of those made-up Artilleries--a 1911 Erfurt which has had a commercial artillery barrel (GERMANY marked) put on it, with a standard rear sight--a very weird bird.

I'm not trying to suggest that there is anything "wrong" with your pistol, there is every possibility that it is originally an LP-08 rebarrelled with a fresh artillery barrel. This is an interesting gun, and it affords us the practical opportunity to learn more about commercial rework practices in Weimar Germany.

--Dwight
Dwight Gruber is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-26-2006, 04:24 PM   #22
Pete Ebbink
User
 
Pete Ebbink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The USA
Posts: 5,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Ed,

I lightened up one of your photos.

Question : From looking at the right side of the elevated Arty sight, it appears from the photo that some TIG welding may have occurred to attach part of the sight to the chamber area of the receiver...just ahead of the arty notch. Is this the case or just something I think I see in the photo ?

Here is the area I am questioning :

Pete Ebbink is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-26-2006, 04:31 PM   #23
Evil_Ed
User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Pete Ebbink
Ed,

I lightened up one of your photos.

Question : From looking at the right side of the elevated Arty sight, it appears from the photo that some TIG welding may have occurred to attach part of the sight to the chamber area of the receiver...just ahead of the arty notch. Is this the case or just something I think I see in the photo ?

Here is the area I am questioning :

Doesn't look like that at all under normal lighting...between having a shutter speed just this side of a second and being in a poorly lit area..and me off-balance and moving around..it looks like it a bit.

I'll take some better photos later this evening which will hopefully clarify the matter!
Evil_Ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-26-2006, 07:48 PM   #24
Evil_Ed
User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Ok, took a few new photos...shadows were killin me out there!

Click on photos for a larger version thereof.


Showing rear toggle...sorry, shadows, but hopefully enough detail exists to make it out...



Showing right side of rear sight...the crud on the bottom of it was just that, crud, soon swabbed off with a q-tip. Notice the number under the sight? I didn't see it until I swabbed the oil and grease off....it has "39" on one side of the screw, and "u" on the other???



The other side of the rear sight...

Evil_Ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-26-2006, 09:05 PM   #25
hqbmw
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 228
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Frank
Hi Ed(s), Jan Still's Imperial Lugers, page 15, Table 3 shows no suffix LP.08 Lugers were produced in 1917. Hope this helps.


Frank,

Correct me if I am misunderstanding you, but my 1917 Arty is definitely WITH suffix: 2972 B. It is all matching and correct. Were you (and Jan) referring to something else? I didn't look at Jan's book before my reply.

Jack Hiles
hqbmw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-26-2006, 09:10 PM   #26
hqbmw
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 228
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Frank
Hi Ed(s), Jan Still's Imperial Lugers, page 15, Table 3 shows no suffix LP.08 Lugers were produced in 1917. Hope this helps.
Frank,

After re-reading and thinking about your quote, I decided it could be interpreted two ways: the way I did: as in NONE; and the way you meant it as in: in addition to suffix labled, no suffix were also available. Am I now correct in my translation of your quote?

Jack
hqbmw is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com