![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
![]() |
#1 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 292
Thanks: 107
Thanked 57 Times in 34 Posts
|
![]()
Hi all,
I have been looking for an explanation of why Erfurt and DWM seem to have changed from manufacturing Lugers with the long sear to short sear. I believe, based upon my own Lugers, those made before 1914 have the long sear, those after 1914 the short. While some 1914s have the long and others the short. I guess this transition took place gradually in 1914. Richard
__________________
"Für Gott, Kaiser, und Vaterland" -seeking: Erfrut Mag 1229 (no script) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,681
Thanks: 1,443
Thanked 4,355 Times in 2,041 Posts
|
![]()
Why? So the pistol can be charged with the safety "on".
When sounds right, and many/most of the earlier ones were modified; so one does not see them very often. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,035
Thanks: 1,106
Thanked 5,242 Times in 1,719 Posts
|
![]()
This is not quite exact. The relieved sear bar is a safety measure that is true. But, it is meant to allow clearing the chamber of a loaded weapon with the safety on. If the striker (firing pin) is not already set you cannot cycle the action with the safety on, the sear bar will not ride up over the lug on the striker. Therefore you can't load/charge the weapon with the safety on.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
![]() |
![]() |
The following 4 members says Thank You to Ron Wood for your post: |
![]() |
#5 |
Super Moderator - Patron
LugerForum Life Patron Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,920
Thanks: 1,377
Thanked 3,135 Times in 1,518 Posts
|
![]()
I can confirm the 1916 transition date. My DWM from early in 1916 is not relieved, and the one from later 1916 is relieved.
"A" block: "N" block: Marc
__________________
- Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere in Northern Italy
Posts: 2,646
Thanks: 1,087
Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,007 Posts
|
![]()
Richard
If I'm not wrong the "short sear" enabled the pistol to be cocked with the safety on. The short sear was invented by George Luger in 1915 and they started to apply it to all his pistols from the year after. My 2 cents. Rgds Sergio
__________________
"Originality can't be restored and should be at the top of any collector's priority list. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,035
Thanks: 1,106
Thanked 5,242 Times in 1,719 Posts
|
![]()
Sergio,
See my post above regarding cocking the pistol with the safety on. ![]() Ron
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 292
Thanks: 107
Thanked 57 Times in 34 Posts
|
![]()
Hmmm...I have a 1914 Erfurt (4" barrel) with a short (relieved sear).
Did they go back and retrofit some of the pre-1916s like they did the hold-opens? Aesthetically, I like the long sear for looks especially with the safety on. I like the way the safety abuts the sear but, that is just me.
__________________
"Für Gott, Kaiser, und Vaterland" -seeking: Erfrut Mag 1229 (no script) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,035
Thanks: 1,106
Thanked 5,242 Times in 1,719 Posts
|
![]()
Yes, some by relieving the existing sear bar and some by replacing it altogether.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
![]() |
![]() |
The following member says Thank You to Ron Wood for your post: |
![]() |
#10 | |
User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,681
Thanks: 1,443
Thanked 4,355 Times in 2,041 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
IF you could charge with the safety on, the safety would not prevent a discharge, DUH! Note to self, think thin write! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|