LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > Off Topic & Other Firearms

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 03-17-2015, 05:21 PM   #1
SteveM
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,016
Thanks: 94
Thanked 275 Times in 137 Posts
Default SIG MCX Pistol w/SBX Brace

I was in Cabelas Saturday and couldn't resist. The ATF can't decide on these now that they have approved them. They initially said it was ok to shoulder them but they have since rescinded that determination. Now if you shoulder it you have redesigned(their words) and changed the manufacturers intent, it would be a SBR and fall under the NFA.

This came as a kit in 300 BLK and 5.56mm with an additional conversion in 7.62x39mm available at a later date. It is a new design with a new gas system, totally modular and ambidextrous controls. I can't wait to try it out. I will probably add a suppressor and will register it as a SBR with a different stock arrangement.

http://www.sigevolution.com/sigmcx
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Sig MCX SBX closed.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	70.6 KB
ID:	47359  

Click image for larger version

Name:	Sig MCX SBX open.jpg
Views:	54
Size:	68.1 KB
ID:	47360  

SteveM is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-17-2015, 10:48 PM   #2
saab-bob
User
 
saab-bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: So Cal
Posts: 459
Thanks: 774
Thanked 143 Times in 87 Posts
Default

Is this the new 5.56 pistol that the BATF was referring to,when it proposed banning the 5.56 green tip ammo?
Doesn't look very concealable to me.
If this is the gun,I was wondering what it looked like.
Will never be sold in California!

Bob
__________________
"I think,therefore I own guns"
saab-bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-18-2015, 06:31 AM   #3
SteveM
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,016
Thanks: 94
Thanked 275 Times in 137 Posts
Default

I don't think it was this particular model the atf was taking about, it was AR pistols in general.
SteveM is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to SteveM for your post:
Unread 03-18-2015, 08:39 PM   #4
Diver6106
User
 
Diver6106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mt. Vernon VA
Posts: 245
Thanks: 1,433
Thanked 117 Times in 75 Posts
Default

My reading on the ATF ruling, is that the brace is fine - BUT you can not put it against your shoulder. IF you do then it is illegal SBR, unless you register it and pay them the $200. It would certainly be a nice CC if carried under a jacket on a single point sling. But much more than needed unless taking on a street gang.
Diver6106 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com