![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
![]() |
#1 |
User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
According to Walter's The Luger Book, Bayard in occupied Belgium manufactured some small Luger parts for Erfurt during the later part of the war (WW1). I believe sideplates, firing pins and probably some other small parts.
Is there any good way to identify these parts? I think the sideplates have a different inspection mark than the Erfurt made sideplates, but do not know that for sure. It looks sort of like a stylized "I" as this is the same mark used on the 1908 Bayard pistols made under German occupation. It would be great to somehow identify these contracted parts.
__________________
Trust me, I'm with the Government. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,990 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
![]()
Here is a copy of the letter that proved it
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The following member says Thank You to Vlim for your post: |
![]() |
#3 |
User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks for that letter, I am saving that for my library. Thats an awesome piece of history right there. I tried to do a google translator for the list of parts and some do not make sense to me.
Zubringer = feeder ? Magazine follower? Abzugshebel = deliver lever ? Maybe the trigger lever in the sideplate? I believe the Kammerfangstuecke is the extractor, Schlagbolzen is the firing pin, Sicherungsriegel is the safety block, the Sicherungshebel is the safety lever and the Deckplatte is the sideplate. At least I think those are the correct meanings. However, I still have the same question, how can these individual pieces be identified from standard Erfurt made parts? Is there even a way to identify them? In the Third Reich the subcontracted parts usually had a manufacturer code and/or a waffenamt that would identify the part. Or at least show it was not manufactured by the main manufacturer. Things like K98 barrels could have a code from the factory where made and the bolts could have different waffenamts, such as FN made bolts distributed to other factories. I am guessing that WW1 subcontracted parts did not necessarily have these type markings.
__________________
Trust me, I'm with the Government. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,990 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
![]()
Zubringer = Follower
Abzugshebel = sear Kammerfangstuck = holdopen If Pieper made them from the start, I think there is no way to identify them as such. Would make an interesting study, though ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks for the translations, that helps a lot. I think you are right, there does not seem to be any way to individually identify the Pieper parts. That's too bad, it would be interesting.
__________________
Trust me, I'm with the Government. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|