![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
![]() |
#4 |
Administrator
& Site Owner LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A Little NE of Somewhere...
Posts: 2,651
Thanks: 477
Thanked 515 Times in 128 Posts
|
![]()
Hi Pete, Doc and Jerry...!
The E/2 does look absolutely correct - in both stamp and placement.. I, too - would like to know the maker, however..?? Also, as to black or brown being "correct" - the answer is "yes", either may be considered as being "correct". In looking at verified "RIGS" (those coming back as a "RIG", where the holster has not been changed or added or "improved"), Perhaps you will notice some interesting characteristics: G Date - primarily black (only two have been noted as "RIGS" however - so it it an insignificant sample); S - Early and Mid - primarily black with some "brown". Late S - Black primarily; "36" and "1936" - about 75% black and 25% brown; 1937 - about 60% black and 40% brown; 1940 - about 55% black and 45% brown; 1941 - All black with 3 brown exceptions noted; 1942 and later - Primarily Black It's interesting, that the preponderance of Brown holsters noted are in the highest productions years - which also may coincide with the Luftwaffe procurement from Mauser for their overall Luger allocation - and coincide with Mauser "peak years". (BTW - this information is from my own database - which can NOT be quoted without permission). However, I'll let folks speculate further as to how/when/where verified brown holsters are properly E/2 proofed - but it should lead to some interesting conclusions, comments and questions..! Best to all..! |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|