LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Navy Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 08-29-2002, 11:24 AM   #1
Orvis25
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post 1936 holster ..1939 toggle says 42 ????

can a 1936 holster go with a 1939Ã?Â* (42 dated toggle luger pistol)?

Is a 1936 Ryffel & Borns (Hannover) holster rare
Orvis25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-29-2002, 11:53 AM   #2
Frank
RIP
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Frank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hot & Dry PHX, AZ
Posts: 2,078
Thanks: 24
Thanked 163 Times in 87 Posts
Post

Hi Dan! It is well known fact that the Germans used WWI Holsters and Lugers in WWII, so it makes perfect sense to me that nearly any serviceable holster would be a possible match to any Luger.

For the purist, or dealer that is trying to make an extra buck or two on a so called "Rig", then the holster should have the same year as the holster. To me this is just hype!! IMHO

One would have to argue that the "Rig" should have a matching magazine and matching spare magazine as well as the properly marked tool, as well. You don't see this condition too often!
Frank is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-29-2002, 12:45 PM   #3
Edward Tinker
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer
LugerForum
Patron
 
Edward Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,941
Thanks: 2,039
Thanked 4,547 Times in 2,100 Posts
Talking

Frank I agree, I think it is nice to have a holster in the same time frame, but the exact year is not as likely to have happened on the battlefield. I think a WW1 era gun with a ww2 holster is very possible, but for a collection, I would want one that is within a couple of years.
__________________
Edward Tinker
************
Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers
Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV

Edward Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-29-2002, 03:12 PM   #4
LP08
User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post

1936 R&B holsters are uncommon but not the rarest of luger holsters. 1935 Heinichen holsters are very rare and the only 1935 military P08 holsters I am aware of. 1936 holsters by Auwarter & Bubeck seem the most common followed by other makers such as R&B (personal observation--not formal study). 1937 holsters are very very hard to find. 1938 through 1942 are very common and many makers appear among them.

A 1936 holster is not at all unusual for a 1939 luger.
LP08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-29-2002, 05:52 PM   #5
P. Ristan
User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Norway
Posts: 50
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cool

".. 1935 Heinichen holsters are very rare and the only military P08 holsters I am aware of."

You can add "Otto Sindel Berlin" to the list of military P08 holsters produced in 1935. I have one in my collection. <img src="graemlins/jumper.gif" border="0" alt="[jumper]" />

P.Ristan
P. Ristan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-30-2002, 09:37 AM   #6
LP08
User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post

That is the first 1935 military P08 holster I have heard of that is not a Heinichen. That is important information. Do you have any photos? Where is the maker's mark located? What color is the holster?

Thanks for any information you can provide. All non-Heinichen 1935s I have seen were police holsters.
LP08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com