![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,991 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
The first pistols even had an antibounce-lock fitted. So it must have been of some concearn to Luger or Borchardt. When they found out the bounce is only minimal, they dropped the bounce lock alltogether.
|
|
|
|
| The following 2 members says Thank You to Vlim for your post: |
|
|
#2 |
|
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 237
Thanks: 1,238
Thanked 126 Times in 84 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 2,679
Thanked 930 Times in 509 Posts
|
From what I understand the bounce was not so minimal in the 1900 model with the flat mainspring. The new coil mainspring made the anti bouce lock superfluous.
Last edited by kurusu; 08-07-2014 at 09:34 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|