Imperial proofs

friendlyfred · 08-31-2012, 04:13 PM

Sorry but I mis-spelled the author of the article Mr. Mittleman. I am incorrect in one post, the distances between what is on my toggle and Mr. Mittleman's article ARE different. The distances are different in the two "supposed authentic" lugers themselves as well as what is on mine. All three are different. I'm really curious about the "curly" figure 2 on mine. While the figure 2 on mine is the first number 27...the figure 2 on the pictorial example is the second number.

If these pistols were not mass production items, it is entirely possible that each could be a little different.

Food for thought???

08-31-2012, 04:13 PM	#10
friendlyfred User Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Washington State Posts: 33 Thanks: 5 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Sorry but I mis-spelled the author of the article Mr. Mittleman. I am incorrect in one post, the distances between what is on my toggle and Mr. Mittleman's article ARE different. The distances are different in the two "supposed authentic" lugers themselves as well as what is on mine. All three are different. I'm really curious about the "curly" figure 2 on mine. While the figure 2 on mine is the first number 27...the figure 2 on the pictorial example is the second number. If these pistols were not mass production items, it is entirely possible that each could be a little different. Food for thought???