![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
#1 |
|
User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Malta
Posts: 570
Thanks: 74
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
|
I have read that the DWM Luger Frame is 129mm long and that of the Mauser produced frames is 300mm long, 1mm longer. The 129mm Frame size, thus it applies to Erfurt andf Simsons frames also?
Alf.
__________________
I prefer a Luger |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Capital of the Free World
Posts: 10,156
Thanks: 3,003
Thanked 2,309 Times in 1,098 Posts
|
Alf,
Please check your math or at least your numbers. 129mm and 300mm are more than 1mm apart... ![]() Also remember that early DWM frames were longer than the later DWM frames for the P.08
__________________
regards, -John S "...We hold these truths to be self-evident that ALL men are created EQUAL and are endowed by their Creator with certain UNALIENABLE rights, and among these are life, LIBERTY, and the pursuit of happiness..." |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,208
Thanks: 1,425
Thanked 4,474 Times in 2,343 Posts
|
I'm a little confused here, too...
Where is this extra length in the early frames??? I've read that the barrel shank (part with the thread) was ~.100" longer...under 1/8"... My S/42 frame is ~130mm long...[has nothing to do with this discussion; just wondering where the "long" frames have the extra length]...
__________________
I like my coffee the way I like my women... ...Cold and bitter...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Always A
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,417
Thanks: 226
Thanked 2,607 Times in 933 Posts
|
Hi Rich, The early "long frame" guns were longer at the front of the frame - in the photos you can see that the curved area at the lower front of the frame on the early gun has a larger radius than on the late DWM frame. The Mauser and Krieghoff frames were 1mm longer at the rear. Regards, Norm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Malta
Posts: 570
Thanks: 74
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() Alf.
__________________
I prefer a Luger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,208
Thanks: 1,425
Thanked 4,474 Times in 2,343 Posts
|
Quote:
...But where is the 1mm longer area at the rear of the frame of Mauser/Krieghoff frames??? At the very rear of the "ears"??? You're not counting the Mauser "hump", are you???
__________________
I like my coffee the way I like my women... ...Cold and bitter...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Malta
Posts: 570
Thanks: 74
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
|
" ...But where is the 1mm longer area at the rear of the frame of Mauser/Krieghoff frames??? At the very rear of the "ears"??? You're not counting the Mauser "hump", are you??? "
Yes, that is the 1mm extra in the Mauser frame. Alf.
__________________
I prefer a Luger |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Always A
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,417
Thanks: 226
Thanked 2,607 Times in 933 Posts
|
Here you go, Rich. The Krieghoff frame is 1mm thicker at the back, the Mauser is the same, except the lower portion has been machined back, leaving the "hump". Regards, Norm
Last edited by Norme; 01-03-2011 at 04:17 PM. Reason: Spelling! |
|
|
|
| The following 3 members says Thank You to Norme for your post: |
![]() |
|
|