![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
#3 |
|
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,908
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,330 Times in 435 Posts
|
Terry,
No question about the "shall" and "not." The ongoing argument on this side of the pond revolves around the two dependent clauses at the beginning of the amendment; there are those who argue that the amendment clarifies the States' abilities to maintain a Militia, and has nothing to do with individual rights. In the actual wording, it is very -not- clear. --Dwight |
|
|
|
|
|