1934-1935 mauser? Help and questions (good pic's of gun, holster & orginal bullets)..

MFC · 06-29-2008, 04:30 AM

Mike,
The #2 mag looks like an"l" to me. It also has a proof on the bottom,(probably E/63), that mag #1 doesn't have. It could just be a mistake made by the person stamping the mags. The two mags look like they are in identcal condition. The size and font style of 2887 match, and even the old oil stains match. It wouldn't surprise me at all, that both mags were originally issued with this Luger.
Mike C.

06-29-2008, 04:30 AM	#25
MFC User Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Louisiana Posts: 1,237 Thanks: 183 Thanked 281 Times in 162 Posts	Mike, The #2 mag looks like an"l" to me. It also has a proof on the bottom,(probably E/63), that mag #1 doesn't have. It could just be a mistake made by the person stamping the mags. The two mags look like they are in identcal condition. The size and font style of 2887 match, and even the old oil stains match. It wouldn't surprise me at all, that both mags were originally issued with this Luger. Mike C. __________________ Mike C.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode