LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > All P-08 Military Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 06-26-2008, 12:22 PM   #21
MFC
User
 
MFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 183
Thanked 281 Times in 162 Posts
Default

Mike, after staring at pictures for a while, the #2 mag might be a taller "e".
Closeup pics. could confirm this.
Mike C.
__________________
Mike C.
MFC is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-26-2008, 02:34 PM   #22
mpowers
User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

MFC, here is a bigger pic of the mag's..hopefully not to large..[IMG][/IMG]

G Vann its hard to see, but look at the two casing between the rounds that say perterson. I know it hard to make out but it does not appear to be made in the U.S.

[IMG][/IMG]


Thanks again guys for feeding the info!
Mike
mpowers is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-26-2008, 02:55 PM   #23
Vlim
Moderator
Lifetime
LugerForum Patron
 
Vlim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,990 Times in 1,205 Posts
Default

Hi,

Didn't see the 'dnh' marked rounds on your other picture.

The 'dnh' rounds are original WW2 German rounds, lacquered steel cases, probably with iron core bullets, made in 1944 by Rheinisch-Westf�¤lische Sprengstoff A.-G., (Previously Gustav Genschow & Co. ) Werk Durlach, in Germany .

The Peters rounds are, as said, not German and not of German WW2 vintage. They're US-made rounds and probably quite old as well.
Vlim is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-26-2008, 03:07 PM   #24
mpowers
User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks G van! I was trying not to post hugh pics, but oh well...

I'm still floored by the amount of info you guys know!!

Mike


Edit
Any suggestion on where or who to trust to appraise the piece? I see a lot of places on line, but to say I am paranoid would be an understatement, lol.
mpowers is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-29-2008, 03:30 AM   #25
MFC
User
 
MFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 183
Thanked 281 Times in 162 Posts
Default

Mike,
The #2 mag looks like an"l" to me. It also has a proof on the bottom,(probably E/63), that mag #1 doesn't have. It could just be a mistake made by the person stamping the mags. The two mags look like they are in identcal condition. The size and font style of 2887 match, and even the old oil stains match. It wouldn't surprise me at all, that both mags were originally issued with this Luger.
Mike C.
__________________
Mike C.
MFC is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com