LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > General Discussions

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 07-03-2003, 12:38 PM   #1
jean
User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post how do i find out

i have said here i own 2 lugers i posted a pic of them now i want to find out there history i have some clue to the history of both lugers now i want to see if its true...i can provide any and all info if i am told what to provide...maybe some one can lead me in the right areas to find out the history origanl person/persons they were issued to and so on...i guess im tring to comfirm the providance on them...here is the pic of them i can of cource provide more detailed pics just tell me what of and ill do so..

thx
__________________
I AM THEREFORE I DO
jean is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-03-2003, 01:01 PM   #2
Edward Tinker
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer
LugerForum
Patron
 
Edward Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,917
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 4,508 Times in 2,082 Posts
Post

It is difficult to find out info on a specific gun / owner. Being military guns they were issued to a person, turned in, reissued etc. There are exceptions, officers and NCO's who became officers many times were required to buy their own pistol. However, unless the gun is unit marked, has documentation etc., then it is the word of the person that told you. Written records, a written or noterized statement all help, but are still "their" word.

Ed
__________________
Edward Tinker
************
Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers
Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV

Edward Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-03-2003, 01:47 PM   #3
mauro
FIREARM HISTORIAN AND AUT
 
mauro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 106
Thanked 349 Times in 129 Posts
Post

Jean,
I have placed your topic here, because of it is not related to the Artillery model.
Ciao
__________________
Mauro Baudino - www.lugerlp08.com www.paul-mauser-archive.com
Mauser Company and Firearm Historian - Mauser Parabellum Certification Service.
mauro is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-03-2003, 02:45 PM   #4
Big Norm
RIP
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 1,864
Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Post

Jean,
the top Luger looks like a customized target gun. Its identity has therefore been lost as a collector piece or even type of Luger. If you want to find out who customized it, then thats another story.

There is not enough in your picture of the second Luger to see just what it is.
Big Norm
Big Norm is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-03-2003, 03:11 PM   #5
Ron Wood
Moderator
2010 LugerForum
Patron
 
Ron Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 6,994
Thanks: 1,070
Thanked 5,107 Times in 1,681 Posts
Post

Jean,

Norm is correct that the target Luger has no provinance other than the individual who customized it.

For the S/42 it is virtually impossible to trace the original individual to whom it was issued. There were few records maintained and of the few that existed most were destroyed by war and time. It is rare for a common military Luger to be associated with an individual, and usually this is only loosely established by family records or the name of the individual written inside the holster, and even then you seldom know if the Luger actually was the one carried in that holster.

This topic comes up frequently by new collectors who would like to know the history of their Lugers. Unfortunately the answer is disappointing. Edward Tinker stated the situation very well.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction
Ron Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-03-2003, 03:53 PM   #6
jean
User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post

well here are a few pics that may help...the s/42 was captured from a colonal out side of Auswitz and the other artillery was a canadian marks mans in the millitay and won 8 target champion ships with it. and i believe it was J Dewey that put it together for him as thats what is on the barrel any way here are the pics i can get the docs of the canadian colonal that got it as a war trofy. its well documented that he was there and that he did take the serender so i have no reason to not believe him...ill get it in writing and the name of the officer he got it from to...that should help..















__________________
I AM THEREFORE I DO
jean is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-03-2003, 06:07 PM   #7
Ron Wood
Moderator
2010 LugerForum
Patron
 
Ron Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 6,994
Thanks: 1,070
Thanked 5,107 Times in 1,681 Posts
Post

Nice G-Date! The information you already have on your Lugers is probably the most you can find out about them. A letter from the Canadian marksman or some other documentation attesting to his ownership and the championships he won with it may have some value to future collectors.

A letter from the Colonel stating from whom he captured the S/42 and perhaps the "surrender papers" would go a long way toward establishing provenance and be of much interest. However, it does not absolutely guarantee that such documentation would be accepted by some collectors as establishing original ownership.

I would recommend obtaining as much documentation as you can and keep them with the Lugers. Every little bit helps in preserving history. Thank you for a look at a couple of very nice Lugers.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction
Ron Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-03-2003, 06:52 PM   #8
jean
User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post

how do i find out the date of the G s/42 model
__________________
I AM THEREFORE I DO
jean is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-03-2003, 07:10 PM   #9
Jimbo
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: SF CA
Posts: 167
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post

Hi Jean,

All G-code Mausers were manufactured in 1935. 1934 Mausers were marked with a "K" to hide the date of manufacture. 1935 Mausers were marked with a "G" instead of the date. In 1936 and thereafter, all Mauser Lugers were stamped with the year of manufacture.

Jimbo
Jimbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-03-2003, 08:23 PM   #10
jean
User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post

thank you...so G = 1935..cool
__________________
I AM THEREFORE I DO
jean is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-03-2003, 10:40 PM   #11
Herb
User
 
Herb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Utah, in the land of the Sleeping Rainbow
Posts: 1,457
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Post

Jean if you do get the German's name and you have some time to do research give this a try.

http://www.archives.gov/research_room/research_topics/captured_german _records/berlin_document_center.html
__________________
Utah, where gun control means a steady trigger pull
Herb is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-04-2003, 08:33 AM   #12
Lugerdoc
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Lugerdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302
Posts: 5,089
Thanks: 6
Thanked 736 Times in 483 Posts
Post

Jean, If customizer Dewey or his company is still in business, he can probably tell you the buyer of this luger from the serial number. Then it would be a matter of finding his history. TH
__________________
Tom Heller POB 398 ST.Charles, MO. 63302
Tel 636-447-3006 lugerdoc@charter.net
Lugerdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-04-2003, 09:05 AM   #13
George Anderson
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 3,592
Thanks: 1,773
Thanked 2,527 Times in 786 Posts
Post

I don't want to be rude, but isn't Auschwitz in Poland? Wasn't it, therefore, captured by the Reds?
George Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-04-2003, 11:46 PM   #14
Jim Keenan
User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 184
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Post

George is correct. Auschwitz is and was in Poland, and I didn't think any troops from the Western Allies got that far east (unless the allied officer was Russian, or the story is, well, not quite true).

BTW, Auschwitz is the German spelling; the Polish name is Oswiecim, and that is what is shown on most modern maps. It is near Krakow.

As for original ownership, the U.S. at least does not have that information for its own weapons, let alone for enemy weapons. Any such trace attempts are almost always a waste of time.

Jim
Jim Keenan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com