LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > All P-08 Military Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 01-15-2016, 09:45 AM   #1
Insayn
User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default 1937 Mauser

Thanks for the add to the forum.
Not too long ago my father passed down to me a German Luger my grandfather brought back from WWII. When the time comes I'll pass it to my eldest.
From the brief time I had to research this forum I've determined it's a 1937 Mauser Luftwaffe I believe. It has a 3 digit serial number, not 4 and no letter. Just about all the parts have the 3 digit number on or the last 2 digits. My question is the cocking assembly has 2 different digits. I am positive my grandfather had not done anything to it. Is it common for parts produced elsewhere to have different numbers? I'll post clear pictures when I get a chance this evening.
Insayn is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-15-2016, 09:57 AM   #2
guns3545
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 435
Thanks: 649
Thanked 490 Times in 216 Posts
Default

Rob,

Welcome to the Forum!

Firstly, pictures are really the most effective way to get your questions answered and so we await them.

Secondly, what makes you think this P.08 was used by a Luftwaffe unit?

Thirdly, in ansewr to your question; P.08s were marked with the full serial number including suffix or no suffix on the front of the frame. The serial number without suffix is also stamped on the left side of the receiver. Most other small parts are stamped with the last two digits of the serial number. Blocks started with SN 1 and went to 10,000. The serial number may also include a suffix depending on the sequence of manufacturing. Production started in 1934 with NS and proceeded through the alphabet, less the letter j. It then repeated again and again..

Fourth, it is NOT usual or correct for serial numbers to be mixed on any given gun. Guns left the factory with all serial numbers matching in accordance with the description given above.

Hope this helps.

Just FYI, the 1937 year did include a block without suffix. The non-suffix block of 10,000 guns was produced in the October time frame or so. Mauser produced about 128,000 guns in 1937. The vast majority went to the Army.

John
guns3545 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-15-2016, 10:24 AM   #3
Insayn
User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Insayn is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-15-2016, 10:29 AM   #4
Vlim
Moderator
Lifetime
LugerForum Patron
 
Vlim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,045
Thanks: 1,034
Thanked 3,939 Times in 1,196 Posts
Default

Made it visible.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Luger.jpg
Views:	46
Size:	144.7 KB
ID:	55950  

Vlim is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Vlim for your post:
Unread 01-15-2016, 10:54 AM   #5
guns3545
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 435
Thanks: 649
Thanked 490 Times in 216 Posts
Default

Gerben,

Thank you for facilitating the picture.

Rob,

Thanks for posting the picture. Now we have a puzzle.

The NS block of guns was produced late in the year.

But.. by the summer, Mauser has switched from the reinforced frame as shown in you picture to the frame with a hump. My old eyes do not see a hump.

Second, by mid-year the transition to salt bluing had taken place. The picture is of a gun produced with strawed parts and no doubt rust bluing. But inspection would confirm it.

Are you sure there is no suffix?? Would be perhaps p through r or so.

Pictures of the magazine in the gun would help. You know, of course that the spare magazine is from a later year.

So we really need to confirm the year and the serial number. Perhaps frame and receiver are from different guns.

The new user section of the board provides guidelines to new users on photographs needed to fully investigate a gun. It would be appreciated if you could review the post and provide additional photos. Or the details of your observations if photos are not available.

Best,

John
guns3545 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-15-2016, 08:24 PM   #6
Insayn
User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Alright, now that I have had time to sit down and look over the forum I see the suffix. I initially thought it was a proof mark. As for Luftwaffe my coworker has a book and researched it in there.




Insayn is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Insayn for your post:
Unread 01-15-2016, 08:25 PM   #7
Insayn
User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default



Insayn is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Insayn for your post:
Unread 01-15-2016, 09:05 PM   #8
Edward Tinker
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer
LugerForum
Patron
 
Edward Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,915
Thanks: 1,989
Thanked 4,506 Times in 2,080 Posts
Default

ok, the byf equals Mauser but your code should be either S/42 or 42 (I don't remember, but know its one of them), byf was in 41 and 1942.

At some point, someone put the wrong toggle back onto the wrong receiver. It could have been at war or it could easily have been after the war (after capture). Even if grandfather did not swap it on purpose, it may have happened. It is highly doubted that it would have stayed in service like that but anything is possible if swapped out by a soldier or unit armorer -
__________________
Edward Tinker
************
Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers
Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV

Edward Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-15-2016, 09:19 PM   #9
Insayn
User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

That's why I inquired. I figured it was a field repair, but was unsure if all parts had matching numbers or if certain parts were made elsewhere and assembled later.. I had a WWI Colt 1911 frame matched up with a WWII slide after it was arsenaled.
Insayn is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-15-2016, 09:26 PM   #10
DonVoigt
User
 
DonVoigt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,678
Thanks: 1,441
Thanked 4,348 Times in 2,038 Posts
Default

I don't see anything about it that "says" Luftwaffe- did your friend explain his conclusion?

What you have today is simply a mismatched Mauser made luger; when/where/who/how it got mixed up we will never know.

Welcome to the luger puzzle forum!
__________________
03man(Don Voigt); Luger student and collector.
Looking for DWM side plate: 69 ; Dreyse 1907 pistol K.S. Gendarmerie
DonVoigt is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-15-2016, 09:54 PM   #11
guns3545
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 435
Thanks: 649
Thanked 490 Times in 216 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Insayn View Post
That's why I inquired. I figured it was a field repair, but was unsure if all parts had matching numbers or if certain parts were made elsewhere and assembled later.. I had a WWI Colt 1911 frame matched up with a WWII slide after it was arsenaled.
Rob,

Pictures are worth a thousand words.

Okay, this looks like a first variation 1937 pistol, with strawed parts, that has had the toggle train switched out with a late, 1941 or 1942 toggle train with the last two numbers of the serial number being 51. Difficult to say how or why the toggle train was switched out.

Everything else in the gun that is visible is consistent with Early 1937 production. Except the magazine whose characteristics I cannot see. But the SN clearly does not match.

I doubt that this gun saw Luftwaffe service. Records show that there was no allocation to the LW in 1937. FYI, in 1937 Krieghoff was in full production with LW contract P.08s.

We can see allocations to the Police and the Navy, very small quantities with the Army getting the vast majority of 1937 P.08 production from Mauser.

Hope this helps.

John
guns3545 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-16-2016, 09:00 AM   #12
Sergio Natali
User
 
Sergio Natali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere in Northern Italy
Posts: 2,646
Thanks: 1,082
Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,007 Posts
Default

FWIK nothing to do with LUFTWAFFE, that at the time was still satisfied with all the KRIEGHOFF production.
I's a pity that it's not completely original, nice gun anyway.
__________________
"Originality can't be restored and should be at the top of any collector's priority list.
Sergio Natali is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-16-2016, 02:24 PM   #13
Mac Cat
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Mac Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 675
Thanks: 2,021
Thanked 545 Times in 294 Posts
Default

Regardless, you have an interesting gun to explore.
The proofs on the right frame are very cool and the serial number is pretty cool - the "100" and matching "00". It's worth exploring further, even if it's not of collector value.

When you break down the gun, you will probably find more parts that are numbered. Even the grips sometimes have numbers inside of them.

Thanks for sharing your photos!
Mac Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-16-2016, 03:26 PM   #14
DavidJayUden
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
Default

Remember that one of every 100 S/42 guns has the correct number of toggle. While never original again, you may be able to buy a shooter with the 00 number, switch toggles, and re-sell the shooter at no loss. Just be certain that you stay in the rust blued series.
Also, as an aside, your side plate does not appear to be on correctly.
dju
DavidJayUden is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-16-2016, 07:04 PM   #15
Mac Cat
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Mac Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 675
Thanks: 2,021
Thanked 545 Times in 294 Posts
Default

Name:  100.jpg
Views: 359
Size:  52.7 KB
I tried to over-expose the original photo to expose the S/N and suffix.

I guessed a "t".
Mac Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-17-2016, 12:52 AM   #16
MFC
User
 
MFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 183
Thanked 281 Times in 162 Posts
Default

It is an 'r' suffix.
__________________
Mike C.
MFC is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to MFC for your post:
Unread 01-17-2016, 04:25 AM   #17
Sergio Natali
User
 
Sergio Natali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere in Northern Italy
Posts: 2,646
Thanks: 1,082
Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,007 Posts
Default

It's an interesting gun I would add, "r" suffix an interesting s/n, and it doesn't seem rebuffed, BUT the most important thing is that it's part of your family heirloom, so it has no price.
__________________
"Originality can't be restored and should be at the top of any collector's priority list.
Sergio Natali is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-17-2016, 09:57 AM   #18
sheepherder
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
sheepherder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,182
Thanks: 1,398
Thanked 4,440 Times in 2,328 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidJayUden View Post
Also, as an aside, your side plate does not appear to be on correctly.
Yes, I saw that too. Maybe a quick re-assembly for the pic [post #7] and the tab wasn't tucked into the frame before locking it in place with the locking bolt ["takedown lever"]???

Yes. In post #6 I can see the tab outside the frame. Not good.
Attached Images
 
__________________
I like my coffee the
way I like my women...
...Cold and bitter...
sheepherder is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to sheepherder for your post:
Unread 01-18-2016, 07:16 AM   #19
Insayn
User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I haven't broke it down. My father did and we sat there staring at it a bit years ago trying to figure out how to reassemble. I'll break it down and try to see what's going on with it and take photos of other parts.
Insayn is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-18-2016, 08:48 AM   #20
DavidJayUden
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
Default

Regarding the side plate assembly, pressing rearward on the (empty) muzzle will allow you to clip in the rear of the side plate, swing the front in and raise the takedown lever. Also YouTube is a good source of assembly tutorials.
And don't feel bad, lots of these have gone back together incorrectly.
dju
DavidJayUden is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com