my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
10-09-2010, 02:28 PM | #1 |
User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: texas
Posts: 60
Thanks: 15
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
|
Luger Pin Numbering
I am still a novice with regard to Lugers. This is a very expansive area with multiple changes over the years. My question is to some of you long-term collectors who have had many examples to examine.
These are two firing pins, one from a 1938 S/42 and the other is from a 1939 S/42. The '39 is numbered to the gun. The '38 is not stamped with a number, but appears to be an electric pencil style engraving of a number that looks like 48. Is this an older style type pin that was replaced, or was it just an armorer replacement? My '39 matches everything down but the clip. The '38 has the same number on the side cover as the rest of the gun, but wasn't fitted to it originally (from another gun?). On the attached pic, the leftmost pin is the one that's in question. For a '38 and a '39 to be so different, please fill me in. I look forward to acquiring my next Luger. And you guys are right, these are addicting - I've loved them since I was a kid. |
10-09-2010, 02:36 PM | #2 |
Lifer 2X
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: May 2005
Location: Somewhere in Montana
Posts: 2,633
Thanks: 3,173
Thanked 2,555 Times in 954 Posts
|
Hard to tell when the firing pin was replaced. However the one with electric pencil marking was not done by the Germans. Probably some past owner keeping track of pins. Bill
__________________
Bill Lyon |
10-09-2010, 02:41 PM | #3 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,988 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
Electro-pencil engraved serial numbers are often encountered on DDR VoPo guns where the original firing pin has been replaced.
|
10-09-2010, 11:07 PM | #4 |
User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: texas
Posts: 60
Thanks: 15
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
|
Thank you Bill and Vlim. I've never posted my '38, it was a bit of a shooter when I found it. The price was right. Maybe in the future I'll post some pictures of it. But when I saw it at the time all matched for numbers I think it's a bit off though. I've enjoyed it nonetheless. Everybody's got to start somewhere with a Luger.
I can honestly respect the guys who collect the unit marked imperial Lugers. I'm just as bad, I collect the dress bayonets the same way. Later, I'll post some pics of the '38. It may be of interest, but it has discrepancies. I know you guys like Luger porn, sorry I didn't take pics of the whole gun. Vlim - I see your point, that's possible. What's odd is that I don't see a import mark on the gun. That's what is confusing to me. I thought it was an earlier pin, like the side plate. Regards, Steve |
10-13-2010, 11:25 AM | #5 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302
Posts: 5,089
Thanks: 6
Thanked 736 Times in 483 Posts
|
Steve, It's possible that an earier non-relieved DWM unnumbered FP could have been installed in your 1938 Mauser by a field armourer, but I agree with the above, that the etched number is probably of DDR origin. TH
|
10-16-2010, 03:07 PM | #6 |
User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: texas
Posts: 60
Thanks: 15
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
|
Tom,
Thanks. Could you explain the unrelieved pin type . Maybe in a week or two I'll post that pistol. It has a few discrepancies but I wouldn't mind getting a few opinions on it. It appears to have the original finish on it, although it isn't in the best of shape. I'll get into more detail if I post it. Regards, Steve |
|
|