my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
02-14-2006, 11:14 PM | #1 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The USA
Posts: 5,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
Eyechart Luger Frame...
Frame on auction that might be a nice start of a unit-marked home project, luger gun...
Unit markings kind of look like an eye chart that got away from someone... http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...?Item=43900091 |
02-14-2006, 11:25 PM | #2 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Mateo, California
Posts: 1,432
Thanks: 2
Thanked 71 Times in 56 Posts
|
Very clever "take", Pete. The latter six letters and numbers appear to be a larger font than the former. I guess some armorer neglected to "x" out the first series of letters and numbers.
|
02-14-2006, 11:30 PM | #3 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The USA
Posts: 5,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
Anyone care to translate the markings...?
|
02-15-2006, 10:25 AM | #4 |
User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 4,243
Thanks: 118
Thanked 245 Times in 150 Posts
|
1st Machinegun Kompany. Infantry Regiment 344. weapon #37
Not marked to regulation, but could be authentic. The trigger guard is bent. Would probably be a pain to make it right again.
__________________
I Still Need DWM side plate #49... if anyone runs across a nice one. What ~Rudyard Kipling~ said... |
02-15-2006, 12:46 PM | #5 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 3,592
Thanks: 1,773
Thanked 2,527 Times in 786 Posts
|
Ron, this is what I read..."1.M.C.K.J.R.344.N.37." Am I wrong, is the second letter a "G"? What is the "N"?
|
02-15-2006, 01:38 PM | #6 |
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 6,989
Thanks: 1,067
Thanked 5,099 Times in 1,676 Posts
|
George,
I had the same question. Could it be that since this is a non-standard marking, the armorer used "N." instead of "No." to indicate "number"? Really a bizarre marking but as the "other Ron" indicated, it could be authentic. Ron, Actually, a bent trigger guard isn't all that difficult to fix with a little bit of patience and a light hand on the non-marring hammer.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
02-15-2006, 05:42 PM | #7 |
User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 4,243
Thanks: 118
Thanked 245 Times in 150 Posts
|
Geo, I think that the C is a mis-struck G. I could be wrong.
The "N" is, I believe a substitute for "Nr." which was used in some earlier markings as "number". I am taking a best guess here, considering that the entire marking is not to regulation. If anyone has a better idea, I am open to correction. Ron, I know it wouldn't be too difficult, if done very skillfully to keep the arc of the guard correct. If you didn't do it carefully. You could spend a lot of time whacking it back and forth. And end up with waves in it. Or even cracking it. Ron
__________________
I Still Need DWM side plate #49... if anyone runs across a nice one. What ~Rudyard Kipling~ said... |
02-16-2006, 12:11 PM | #8 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The USA
Posts: 5,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
Ron S.,
How about a properly sized/tapered wooden dowel that is driven (with hammer taps...) into the trigger guard from opposing sides, back and forth, until the proper curvature is re-established...? |
02-16-2006, 12:55 PM | #9 |
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 6,989
Thanks: 1,067
Thanked 5,099 Times in 1,676 Posts
|
An appropriate support inside the trigger guard is all that is required when tapping it back into shape. A piece of black iron pipe works well. Clamp one end in a vise and use the pipe as an anvil. Kind of like "hammer and dolly" body work.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
02-16-2006, 01:07 PM | #10 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Box 240188, Douglas, Alaska, 99824
Posts: 463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 52 Times in 32 Posts
|
Agree with Ron Smith on unit ID.
Jan |
02-16-2006, 02:48 PM | #11 |
User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 32
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Soooo, who's gonna buy it and take on the task? Would it be to much to ask for a step by step photo log of the progress, and parts price log?
Green57 |
02-17-2006, 06:47 AM | #12 |
User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 789
Thanks: 0
Thanked 84 Times in 34 Posts
|
I think for $149. its going to sit unsold
I'd give the guy $50 Jim
__________________
The "truth" is a matter of Perception |
|
|