LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > All P-08 Military Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 11-08-2010, 07:05 AM   #41
LugerVern
User
 
LugerVern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 563
Thanks: 1
Thanked 34 Times in 27 Posts
Default

Well, I for one am still not convinced.

The serial number on the barrel is simply a mess.

I challenge the Mauser collectors to show me a similar "5" from one of their guns?

Common prove me wrong

Mauser fonts are not consistent, so I might be wrong!

Oh and while your at it tell me why the two "6's" look so different is size, and its not because of the curvature of the barrel. Very nice spacing by the way?


Vern
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Numbers.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	186.5 KB
ID:	15615  

LugerVern is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-08-2010, 08:17 AM   #42
Norme
Always A
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Norme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,414
Thanks: 224
Thanked 2,591 Times in 930 Posts
Default

Here you go, Vern. Regards, Norm
P.S. Gun illustrated is a 41 42 with British proofs.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8805.jpg
Views:	28
Size:	65.8 KB
ID:	15617  

Norme is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-08-2010, 03:10 PM   #43
dascoyne
User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 5
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LugerVern View Post
Well, I for one am still not convinced.

The serial number on the barrel is simply a mess.

I challenge the Mauser collectors to show me a similar "5" from one of their guns?

Common prove me wrong

Mauser fonts are not consistent, so I might be wrong!

Oh and while your at it tell me why the two "6's" look so different is size, and its not because of the curvature of the barrel. Very nice spacing by the way?


Vern
The "5" isn't as messed up as the earlier photo might suggest.

Fortunately I just bought a new camera (Sony Nex-5).

Here are some better images.





Quote:
Originally Posted by LugerVern View Post
I keep looking at the " one" on the frame SN and it just worries me along with the perfect finish.

I actually see a messed with "3" , there should be no doubt on a perfect gun.

Pretty gun though, just needs to be looked at very carefully buy any buyer ( always good advice)

Vern
The "messed up 3" must have also been artifact from a lousy photo.

The "1" is clearly a "1"



Last edited by dascoyne; 11-08-2010 at 05:17 PM.
dascoyne is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-08-2010, 03:47 PM   #44
Bama Shooter
New User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Give it the simichrome test. If it refinished then the test will show a blue to black hue on the qtip. If it is original you will see a brown coloration.

Also open the action: What does it smell like. If it smells like Grandma's purse then it is probably original. If it does not then I would be that the simichrome test does not come out brown.
Bama Shooter is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Bama Shooter for your post:
Unread 11-08-2010, 04:11 PM   #45
Norme
Always A
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Norme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,414
Thanks: 224
Thanked 2,591 Times in 930 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bama Shooter View Post
Give it the simichrome test. If it refinished then the test will show a blue to black hue on the qtip. If it is original you will see a brown coloration.

Also open the action: What does it smell like. If it smells like Grandma's purse then it is probably original. If it does not then I would be that the simichrome test does not come out brown.
Leaving aside my views on the originality of this particular gun (100% Kosher in my opinion), I question whether the Simichrome test is useful on the salt blue finish applied from 1937 on. As for the Grandma's purse test, well really! Regards
Norme is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-08-2010, 05:51 PM   #46
Thor
User
 
Thor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rio Rancho, New Mexico
Posts: 4,583
Thanks: 958
Thanked 970 Times in 276 Posts
Default

Gentlemen, FWIW, I checked my database of Thor Restorations and this Luger is NOT in my listings. It has NOT been through TLC treatment (Thor's Luger Clinic)
__________________
Thor's Luger Clinic http://members.rennlist.com/lugerman/
Ted Green (Thor Yaller Boots)
725 Western Hills Dr SE, Rio Rancho, NM 87124
915-526-8925 Email
thor340@aol.com
-----------------------------------
John3:3
Jesus answered and said to him, "Most assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God."
Thor is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-08-2010, 08:43 PM   #47
dascoyne
User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 5
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Edward Tinker View Post
The magazine serial number, I'd like to see it where I could blow it up and look at it?
Further, a picture or two from the sides, it is either photo trickery, or its been ground and restamped.
Here are some better views of the magazine. The earlier pics were pretty lousy.

Sorry I did get the pics in earlier - I was waiting for the new camera.





Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidJayUden View Post
No P08 on the side for another year. Are the grips numbered/marked?
Very nice.
dju
I hope this helps. Other than a couple of small symbols I don't see any numbers.



dascoyne is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com