Two holsters for identification

markbritt · 01-06-2014, 07:03 PM

I have two holsters here that I picked up as part of a trade. The leather is old and supple, but I suspect they are probably repo's as there is no dates stamped on the back. If anyone can tell me what they are and approximate worth, I'd appreciate it.

Mark

Lugerdoc · 01-07-2014, 10:16 AM

Mark. The holster on the left with the single belt loop is the post 1908 Bulgarian pattern, missing the spare mag pouch snap closure flap and a repair at the toe. The one on the right is a WW2 pattern (back reinforces the mag pouch) standard military issue. These would normally have the maker and date marked on the back, between the belt loops. Tom

alanint · 01-07-2014, 12:58 PM

The second holster is not a true military issue, as it has a stud closure, rather than a buckle and no evidence of once having a buckle closure, (no stiching for buckle on holster cover and no multiple holes in the tongue).

This is a commercially made holster loosely following the military pattern.

01-06-2014, 07:03 PM	#1
markbritt User Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: NW Indiana Posts: 240 Thanks: 5 Thanked 48 Times in 22 Posts	Two holsters for identification I have two holsters here that I picked up as part of a trade. The leather is old and supple, but I suspect they are probably repo's as there is no dates stamped on the back. If anyone can tell me what they are and approximate worth, I'd appreciate it. Mark Attached Thumbnails

01-07-2014, 10:16 AM	#2
Lugerdoc Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302 Posts: 5,089 Thanks: 6 Thanked 736 Times in 483 Posts	Mark. The holster on the left with the single belt loop is the post 1908 Bulgarian pattern, missing the spare mag pouch snap closure flap and a repair at the toe. The one on the right is a WW2 pattern (back reinforces the mag pouch) standard military issue. These would normally have the maker and date marked on the back, between the belt loops. Tom __________________ Tom Heller POB 398 ST.Charles, MO. 63302 Tel 636-447-3006 lugerdoc@charter.net

01-07-2014, 12:58 PM	#3
alanint User Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Marco Island, Florida Posts: 4,867 Thanks: 1,685 Thanked 1,916 Times in 1,192 Posts	The second holster is not a true military issue, as it has a stud closure, rather than a buckle and no evidence of once having a buckle closure, (no stiching for buckle on holster cover and no multiple holes in the tongue). This is a commercially made holster loosely following the military pattern.