my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
04-14-2011, 05:16 PM | #1 |
User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 288
Thanks: 20
Thanked 34 Times in 19 Posts
|
Help wanted - and needed
Gents,
A good friend is looking at two Lugers on GB. Comments, anyone? Balder http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=224235784 http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=224508509 |
04-14-2011, 07:20 PM | #2 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,016
Thanks: 94
Thanked 275 Times in 137 Posts
|
The straw looks to be freshened up(to me)on the 1937, he doesn't allow for an inspection period either. Straw is to bright for a 74 yr old gun, at least to my eyes.
The 1936 looks honest, I would probably go for it. The seller doesn't specify inspection period, I would surely ask before bidding. I could be way off base on both FWIW. I sure ain't no expert. |
04-14-2011, 07:43 PM | #3 |
Always A
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,417
Thanks: 226
Thanked 2,603 Times in 933 Posts
|
Hi John, I have to disagree with Steve above (sorry Steve). I like the 1937 which seems to me to be an authentic example of a rather scarce sub-variation. The 1936 appears to me to be refinished, the muzzle on rust blued guns should be "in the white", and the knurled portions of the strawed parts look suspiciously clean. Of course, all this is based on the rather poor photos offered by both sellers. Best regards, Norm
|
The following member says Thank You to Norme for your post: |
04-15-2011, 10:15 AM | #4 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Mateo, California
Posts: 1,432
Thanks: 2
Thanked 71 Times in 56 Posts
|
The straw on both may have been cleaned up a bit and I say "maybe". Both these S/42's look to have fine original finish, especially the 1937. I particularly like the halos around the barrel serial number of the 1937. If I were in the market for these last of the rust blued fine made Mauser luger types, I would give them serious consideration. Getting a three day inspection period honored to and from Norway may be a little difficult unless they are actually to be bought in the US.
|
04-15-2011, 10:39 AM | #5 |
User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 288
Thanks: 20
Thanked 34 Times in 19 Posts
|
Gentlemen,
Thank you for your input, I was also a bit concerned about the strawing on the 1937. How about price? Even though I am in Norway, the potential buyer is in Texas. I guess I need to take some blame/credit for his interest in Lugers - he came visiting here two years ago and seemed to like my little collection of 11 Lugers, one of which we took to the range as well. Contagious little things they are. Balder |
04-15-2011, 02:32 PM | #6 |
User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 32
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
|
Hi John
There is something stange about markings on the right side of receiver of the 1936 ..... according to my information it doesnt match ( the numbers are to big regarded to the "eagle" )....but on the other hand the price, if still of 1300 $, is not too much for a 70 years old gun... would be kind if Norm will comment about markings... |
04-15-2011, 02:50 PM | #7 |
Always A
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,417
Thanks: 226
Thanked 2,603 Times in 933 Posts
|
Hi Pierre, I don't see anything wrong with the right side marks, they look like my 1936 S/42. I'm not crazy about the condition and that blued muzzle bothers me. Of course, it could just be the photo....
Regards, Norm |
04-18-2011, 07:08 AM | #8 |
User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 32
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
|
Many thanks for the comment Norm ! the drawings in my documentation are something different.... so I'll try to find some more documentation about these "waffenamt markings " but yours pictures will help for a next examination of one of these S42 Lugers
kind regards |
|
|