LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Early Lugers (1900-1906)

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 06-04-2012, 05:39 PM   #1
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,133 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default In re the chubby lugers!!

One gun seems to have taken off this year right behind the Test pieces. How many were made? Where can I fint the whole story? Eric, Esq
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	fat boy.jpg
Views:	22
Size:	80.1 KB
ID:	26781  

cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-04-2012, 09:03 PM   #2
drbuster
User
 
drbuster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Mateo, California
Posts: 1,432
Thanks: 2
Thanked 71 Times in 56 Posts
Default

Eric, do you have a picture of the other side?
drbuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-04-2012, 09:27 PM   #3
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,133 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default All sides

On display Rock Island Auction. My post stroke memory thinks!!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	left 1.jpg
Views:	18
Size:	80.8 KB
ID:	26782  

Click image for larger version

Name:	left 2.jpg
Views:	10
Size:	50.3 KB
ID:	26783  

Click image for larger version

Name:	left 3.jpg
Views:	11
Size:	80.8 KB
ID:	26784  

cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-04-2012, 09:28 PM   #4
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,133 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default

The only difference from my test piece is 9mm barrel!!
cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-05-2012, 02:01 AM   #5
MFC
User
 
MFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 183
Thanked 281 Times in 162 Posts
Default

No C/B C/U proofs on the left receiver. Is the serial# in range for a Cartridge Counter? The front of the frame looks like it was sanded down. The profile just doesn't look correct.
__________________
Mike C.
MFC is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-05-2012, 08:57 AM   #6
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,133 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default

nice work!
cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-05-2012, 05:22 PM   #7
Ron Wood
Moderator
2010 LugerForum
Patron
 
Ron Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 6,987
Thanks: 1,067
Thanked 5,090 Times in 1,675 Posts
Default

I agree with Mike, the front of the frame looks really mis-shaped.

The Model 1902 "Fat Barrel" is a landmark weapon. It is the gun that introduced the now universal caliber 9mm Parabellum. It was produced in relatively limited numbers, an estimated 800 Commercial and 900 American Eagle examples. It is also the basis for the fabled U.S. Test Trials Cartridge Counter.

From the beginning of my collecting, a Model 1902 was one of my goals. None other than Ralph Shattuck advised me in the early 1980s that it was a very lofty goal and probably beyond the reach of a beginning collector. I ultimately did land one, and it was a dandy. The late Harry Jones had it recorded in his notes as "one of the best he had ever seen". So set your sights high and who knows, maybe it is attainable. (but beware, many fakes have been produce for such a scarce item)
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction
Ron Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 3 members says Thank You to Ron Wood for your post:
Unread 06-05-2012, 06:32 PM   #8
sheepherder
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
sheepherder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,182
Thanks: 1,398
Thanked 4,440 Times in 2,328 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Wood View Post
I agree with Mike, the front of the frame looks really mis-shaped.
I know nothing about these, but that frame front sure does look 'angled'...

And as I look at that, my eyes are drawn to the 'scallops' on the front of the receiver...They sure look shorter than any other 'scallops' I've looked at...Is that a common trait among fat barrels/Test Lugers???
__________________
I like my coffee the
way I like my women...
...Cold and bitter...
sheepherder is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-05-2012, 07:09 PM   #9
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,133 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default

Where either variety have a holster made for them!
cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-05-2012, 11:25 PM   #10
Ron Wood
Moderator
2010 LugerForum
Patron
 
Ron Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 6,987
Thanks: 1,067
Thanked 5,090 Times in 1,675 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by postino View Post
And as I look at that, my eyes are drawn to the 'scallops' on the front of the receiver...They sure look shorter than any other 'scallops' I've looked at...Is that a common trait among fat barrels/Test Lugers???
Yeah, the '02 scallops are a bit short. Kind of an artifact of the transition from the long frame to the short frame.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction
Ron Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Ron Wood for your post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com