LugerForum Discussion Forums

LugerForum Discussion Forums (https://forum.lugerforum.com/index.php)
-   Early Lugers (1900-1906) (https://forum.lugerforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=121)
-   -   In re the chubby lugers!! (https://forum.lugerforum.com/showthread.php?t=28425)

cirelaw 06-04-2012 05:39 PM

In re the chubby lugers!!
 
1 Attachment(s)
One gun seems to have taken off this year right behind the Test pieces. How many were made? Where can I fint the whole story? Eric, Esq

drbuster 06-04-2012 09:03 PM

Eric, do you have a picture of the other side?

cirelaw 06-04-2012 09:27 PM

All sides
 
3 Attachment(s)
On display Rock Island Auction. My post stroke memory thinks!!

cirelaw 06-04-2012 09:28 PM

The only difference from my test piece is 9mm barrel!!

MFC 06-05-2012 02:01 AM

No C/B C/U proofs on the left receiver. Is the serial# in range for a Cartridge Counter? The front of the frame looks like it was sanded down. The profile just doesn't look correct.

cirelaw 06-05-2012 08:57 AM

nice work!

Ron Wood 06-05-2012 05:22 PM

I agree with Mike, the front of the frame looks really mis-shaped.

The Model 1902 "Fat Barrel" is a landmark weapon. It is the gun that introduced the now universal caliber 9mm Parabellum. It was produced in relatively limited numbers, an estimated 800 Commercial and 900 American Eagle examples. It is also the basis for the fabled U.S. Test Trials Cartridge Counter.

From the beginning of my collecting, a Model 1902 was one of my goals. None other than Ralph Shattuck advised me in the early 1980s that it was a very lofty goal and probably beyond the reach of a beginning collector. I ultimately did land one, and it was a dandy. The late Harry Jones had it recorded in his notes as "one of the best he had ever seen". So set your sights high and who knows, maybe it is attainable. (but beware, many fakes have been produce for such a scarce item)

sheepherder 06-05-2012 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron Wood (Post 214430)
I agree with Mike, the front of the frame looks really mis-shaped.

I know nothing about these, but that frame front sure does look 'angled'...

And as I look at that, my eyes are drawn to the 'scallops' on the front of the receiver...They sure look shorter than any other 'scallops' I've looked at...Is that a common trait among fat barrels/Test Lugers??? :confused:

cirelaw 06-05-2012 07:09 PM

Where either variety have a holster made for them!

Ron Wood 06-05-2012 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by postino (Post 214434)
And as I look at that, my eyes are drawn to the 'scallops' on the front of the receiver...They sure look shorter than any other 'scallops' I've looked at...Is that a common trait among fat barrels/Test Lugers??? :confused:

Yeah, the '02 scallops are a bit short. Kind of an artifact of the transition from the long frame to the short frame.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com