LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Unit Markings

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 07-26-2004, 01:31 AM   #15
Dwight Gruber
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,908
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,330 Times in 435 Posts
Post

Let me continue to devilishly advocate.

There are collectors who are suspicious or sceptical about markings which are not in ordnung, who assert that one can only draw positive conclusions about Lugers whose markings strictly adhere to the instructins for their application. In their view the magazine spine marking would be another indication that this pistol's markings cannot represent Hannover, because it is marked in a way which is not specified in any known State's instructions. I have run into exactly this set of opinions with the HP./H.P. controversy.

This assertion does not apparently allow for error or misinterpretation on the part of the armorers who actually stamp the pistols, and does not address known markings which can only be the result of such mistake (LSAl./LS.Al).

The figure on the magazine described as an arc with lines over a 6 is most likely an Eagle/6, the inspector's marking associated with Simson.

--Dwight
Dwight Gruber is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com