LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > New Collectors Forum

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 08-18-2004, 12:20 AM   #12
RockinWR
User
 
RockinWR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: D/FW, Tx
Posts: 279
Thanks: 109
Thanked 31 Times in 16 Posts
Post

Don M.,
* The attached URL might answer some of your questions:

http://www.gunboards.com/luger/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=2200

* A "q" block with a Simson barrel proof made new or re-barrelled from a 7.65mm DWM (BKIW) commercial for a Police contract about 1927. As you can see the noted author and collector, Jan Still, believes these are newly made pistols
* I think the interesting question is "who" did the Weimar Alpha DWM "q" blocks for the Police?
- Was it Simson who was sanctioned by the Allied Commission to supply Lugers during this period? Did Simson purchase BKIW commercials & rebarrel to 9mm for a Police contract?
- Was it BKIW who had the capacity, capability, survival need, and spares to assembly a large order for Police replacement upgrades; but, needed the Simson proof(?)/acceptance(?) for the 9mm rework to gain covert coverage from the Allied Commission Inspectors?? While Sam Costanzo (WOLI) calls this barrel stamp a Simson stamp and it has the form of a number of stamps attributes to Simson, is it in fact a Simson stamp??
- Was the barrel conversion done by the Police themselves & we are looking at a Police re-proof barrel mark?
* BKIW is known to have shipped the Finns a batch of "q" blocks; so, it appears Contract pistols were the order of the day @ DWM.
* In any event, where is the Police sear safety on this example? Did this pistol escape that addition because it was actively used at a Police school & could not be made available for this update?
* The "b" block, blue tubed mag likely came from a 1938 S/42 P.08. This is intuitively contemporary to the 1937 holster. The "3172 no suffix", bright tube mag does indeed look like a "K" date mag with an O37 acceptance and block "S" mark. The "37" does not relate to the year 1937; but, rather to the Waffenamt inspector's "team" number assigned to the Mauser plant in 1934.
* Thats what makes the Weimar era so interesting. Just about the time you have a shread of continuity, the unexpected exception arises.
* Hope this answers more questions than it poses.
Respectfully,
Bob
RockinWR is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com