Interarms Mauser Parabellum Construction

Michael Zeleny · 08-27-2003, 06:29 PM

Dear Bob, -- thanks for the reassurance, but I belong to the school that insists on traditional sidearms of traditional construction. This was supposed to be an interim replacement of my P210-2, presumptively lost to the vagaries of our judicial system. (I was found innocent; not so the handgun.) There is no substitute for that milled out of solid bar stock tactile feel.

Both magazines feed and extract fine. The problem is with ejection and last shot lockup.

08-27-2003, 06:29 PM	#6
Michael Zeleny Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 525 Thanks: 129 Thanked 139 Times in 76 Posts	Dear Bob, -- thanks for the reassurance, but I belong to the school that insists on traditional sidearms of traditional construction. This was supposed to be an interim replacement of my P210-2, presumptively lost to the vagaries of our judicial system. (I was found innocent; not so the handgun.) There is no substitute for that milled out of solid bar stock tactile feel. Both magazines feed and extract fine. The problem is with ejection and last shot lockup. __________________ Michael Zeleny@post.harvard.edu -- http://larvatus.livejournal.com/ -- 7576 Willow Glen Road, Los Angeles, CA 90046 -- 323.363.1860 All of old. Nothing else ever. Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. -- Samuel Beckett