06/24 first variation... blueing

panda · 10-05-2003, 01:37 PM

As I understand, there is no evidence whatsoever that this gun was assembled by W+F.

Do these "knowledgeable luger collectors" at least have a plausible explanation why W+F would have made such a gun that looks exactly like a patchwork of 1900-06-29 lugers, and why W+F would have marked it not only with the current Swiss cross but also with the several decades outdated former Swiss cross?

What about the gun's s/n(s)?

10-05-2003, 01:37 PM	#14
panda User Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 148 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	As I understand, there is no evidence whatsoever that this gun was assembled by W+F. Do these "knowledgeable luger collectors" at least have a plausible explanation why W+F would have made such a gun that looks exactly like a patchwork of 1900-06-29 lugers, and why W+F would have marked it not only with the current Swiss cross but also with the several decades outdated former Swiss cross? What about the gun's s/n(s)?