Witness Mark and Barrel Questions

Ron Wood · 03-06-2003, 03:58 PM

Glad no offense was taken because none was intended. It was a legitimate concern. What prompted what was intended to be a slightly humorous mis-quote, is that there are a few armorer's kits in existence (whether discovered complete or assembled), and they do not appear to have any tools for field R&R of barrels. Perhaps such a tool was a separate item of issue? I would be interested in hearing a little bit more about this field barrel R&R issue if anyone has any information.

03-06-2003, 03:58 PM	#24
Ron Wood Moderator 2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso Posts: 7,040 Thanks: 1,106 Thanked 5,257 Times in 1,724 Posts	Glad no offense was taken because none was intended. It was a legitimate concern. What prompted what was intended to be a slightly humorous mis-quote, is that there are a few armorer's kits in existence (whether discovered complete or assembled), and they do not appear to have any tools for field R&R of barrels. Perhaps such a tool was a separate item of issue? I would be interested in hearing a little bit more about this field barrel R&R issue if anyone has any information. __________________ If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction