LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > General Discussions

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 11-07-2003, 12:11 PM   #5
Doubs
User
 
Doubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Byron, Georgia
Posts: 1,736
Thanks: 819
Thanked 1,769 Times in 586 Posts
Post

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">Originally posted by John Sabato:
<strong>I don't think they would be inclined to add them or the Stainless Steel (Mitchell, Stoeger, AIMCO, or Orimar) guns to the list simply because they don't meet the 50-year old criteria that the C&R list was designed for.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">John, I think Sieger's question is if the 1970's Swiss-style Parabellums are C&R, why aren't the Parabellums of the same time period, made by the same company, with the traditional grip contour also C&R? I've often wondered the same thing and it's my opinion that someone requested the Swiss-style Mausers be C&R - and it was approved - while no one has gone to the trouble of submitting the paperwork for the others. Just my thoughts on it.
Doubs is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com