HK Holster Question...

John D. · 07-15-2004, 04:36 PM

Hey Pete..!!

Much better pics of the LWaA and the digets! Thanks!!! Notice the difference between the first set and the second? The first set LWaA looks "stretched" or elongated. Not so in the second.. Yep - now that looks original and period correct..

Also - the digets. Again - I'd want to compare the "6" to my holster "6" - but, if my memory isn't going haywire - I'm more convinced it's an armorers stamp. Was it stamped at some point to HK 5665 - I'd bet more then even money on it. However - was it the original (i.e. "the first") holster issued to that HK? Again, my bet would be it's not...

My thanks again for the pics!!!

<img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/beerchug.gif" />

07-15-2004, 04:36 PM	#17
John D. Administrator & Site Owner LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: A Little NE of Somewhere... Posts: 2,651 Thanks: 477 Thanked 515 Times in 128 Posts	Hey Pete..!! Much better pics of the LWaA and the digets! Thanks!!! Notice the difference between the first set and the second? The first set LWaA looks "stretched" or elongated. Not so in the second.. Yep - now that looks original and period correct.. Also - the digets. Again - I'd want to compare the "6" to my holster "6" - but, if my memory isn't going haywire - I'm more convinced it's an armorers stamp. Was it stamped at some point to HK 5665 - I'd bet more then even money on it. However - was it the original (i.e. "the first") holster issued to that HK? Again, my bet would be it's not... My thanks again for the pics!!! <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/beerchug.gif" />