![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
#15 |
|
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The USA
Posts: 5,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
|
Hey John D.,
No need to apologize for your posting...I was just trying to carry the debate a bit further. Can you provide some insights as to why you thought the style of my LWaA2 stamp was not correct for the # 5665 gun timeframe of 1936-1937. Does another style of LWaA occurs on as-issued holsters from 1936-1937...if yes, do you have a jpeg you might post to make me a bit smarter ? One more thing to ruminate about... The time of the stamping of "5665" may not be the same time the stamping of "LWaA2" occured... Maybe the HK inspector inspected/accepted a batch of spare, replacement holsters that went into armoury stores at one time and later when issued as a replacement to a lost/damaged holster for gun # 5665, the "5665" stamping was applied...? Will get more photos up on the Forum this weekend... Regards, Pete... <img border="0" alt="[typing]" title="" src="graemlins/yltype.gif" /> |
|
|
|
|
|