mag original or ??

John D. · 12-09-2003, 10:18 PM

hmmm - how'd I miss this thread!!!?????

The orientation and the stamps look fine. I've got an HK mag very close to the ser. number in the auction. Also - the "1" - while it looks strange - is absolutely correct (a very short baseline with an exaggerated overhang/serif...

The only thing I don't quite understand is the feint line across the baseline? Ã¢?? but all the photos are slightly Ã¢??offÃ¢?Â (very blue with reflections off the tube/base) so I think itÃ¢??s the picture and a reflection of some sort..???

The rest of it looks just fine - tube, base, construction, etc....

Hope this helps!!!

12-09-2003, 10:18 PM	#4
John D. Administrator & Site Owner LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: A Little NE of Somewhere... Posts: 2,651 Thanks: 477 Thanked 515 Times in 128 Posts	hmmm - how'd I miss this thread!!!????? The orientation and the stamps look fine. I've got an HK mag very close to the ser. number in the auction. Also - the "1" - while it looks strange - is absolutely correct (a very short baseline with an exaggerated overhang/serif... The only thing I don't quite understand is the feint line across the baseline? Ã¢?? but all the photos are slightly Ã¢??offÃ¢?Â (very blue with reflections off the tube/base) so I think itÃ¢??s the picture and a reflection of some sort..??? The rest of it looks just fine - tube, base, construction, etc.... Hope this helps!!!