LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > Repairs, Restoration & Refinishing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-05-2021, 01:59 PM   #1
spangy
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
spangy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 632
Thanks: 3,206
Thanked 1,068 Times in 437 Posts
Default

I immediately think weak/short mainspring. Maybe try your old original spring again.
Also check the frames breach block slider grooves for dirt/debris.

You also state the gun has been re-barreled within the last 8 years, with the receiver axle pin removed check that the breach block and toggle link assembly slide easily along the length of the receiver without feeling any abnormal resistance. Re-barreling puts incredible stress on the receiver if not done by a competent gunsmith with proper tools for the job.

Good luck.
__________________
Whoever said that "money can't buy you happiness" never bought a Luger.
WTB - Take Down Lever & Trigger Plate (#90) for an Imperial Artillery.
spangy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2021, 05:21 PM   #2
Military Engineer
User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 41
Thanks: 9
Thanked 37 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spangy View Post
I immediately think weak/short mainspring. Maybe try your old original spring again.
Also check the frames breach block slider grooves for dirt/debris.

You also state the gun has been re-barreled within the last 8 years, with the receiver axle pin removed check that the breach block and toggle link assembly slide easily along the length of the receiver without feeling any abnormal resistance. Re-barreling puts incredible stress on the receiver if not done by a competent gunsmith with proper tools for the job.

Good luck.
The main spring has 22 rungs on it. I wonder if that makes much difference, given I think the standard was 19 for the WW1 military ones?

I am considering a main spring (I've been reading up on the subject here in the forum). It just seems like the spring is pretty stout and I believe it was replaced about the same time as the barrel.

I will check the fitting. There is a little resistance to the bolt going back into the forks when I reassemble, but it hasn't been a problem up to now. I always thought that was there to slow the bolt to aid the mainspring in preventing it from slamming back into the rear of the frame. I mentioned to another poster here that I might consider hand stoning with a fine stone the rail grooves in the fork and the rails on the bolt to smooth out/polish/open up the tolerances. It long been a shooter grade, so I'm not horribly worried about ruining collector value. Just do it slowly until the resistance goes away.

Mark
Military Engineer is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Military Engineer for your post:
Old 09-05-2021, 06:27 PM   #3
spangy
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
spangy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 632
Thanks: 3,206
Thanked 1,068 Times in 437 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Military Engineer View Post
There is a little resistance to the bolt going back into the forks when I reassemble
22 is the normal coil count for a mainspring. Before I started shaving metal I would exhaust all other avenues.

"There is a little resistance to the toggle train going back into the fork when I reassemble. It's always been that way, but never given me the issue before."

The only resistance one would normally feel would be when the breach bolt engaged the ejector spring when reassembling. Anything above that and I would start to think about the re-barrel warping or altering the fork positions. Grab a caliper and measure the distance between the forks to check for warped forks all along the forks front to back. It should be around .51" give or take .005" but most importantly they should be the same distance all along the forks, front, middle and back, any noticeable distance change would indicate a warped or 'bent' fork. You also must check the vertical orientation but if it was a vertical aberration you would most likely notice that the axle pin would not fit smoothly.

Again though, I would start with the mainspring.

Good luck Mark.
__________________
Whoever said that "money can't buy you happiness" never bought a Luger.
WTB - Take Down Lever & Trigger Plate (#90) for an Imperial Artillery.
spangy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2021, 08:32 PM   #4
Military Engineer
User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 41
Thanks: 9
Thanked 37 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spangy View Post
22 is the normal coil count for a mainspring. Before I started shaving metal I would exhaust all other avenues.

"There is a little resistance to the toggle train going back into the fork when I reassemble. It's always been that way, but never given me the issue before."

The only resistance one would normally feel would be when the breach bolt engaged the ejector spring when reassembling. Anything above that and I would start to think about the re-barrel warping or altering the fork positions. Grab a caliper and measure the distance between the forks to check for warped forks all along the forks front to back. It should be around .51" give or take .005" but most importantly they should be the same distance all along the forks, front, middle and back, any noticeable distance change would indicate a warped or 'bent' fork. You also must check the vertical orientation but if it was a vertical aberration you would most likely notice that the axle pin would not fit smoothly.

Again though, I would start with the mainspring.

Good luck Mark.
Spangy,

Good onfo. I'll measure tonight. In the meantime, I'm going to order Wolff's gunspring packet for this since it's only a $20 deal or so. If this doesn't solve it, and there is a noticable difference in the fork alignment, is there a fix to this or is it toast and now just a wall hanger? I can't imagine the hardened steel being very amenable to shaping.
Military Engineer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2021, 09:10 PM   #5
gunbugs
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
gunbugs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska. Home of the best moose.
Posts: 681
Thanks: 375
Thanked 1,227 Times in 414 Posts
Default

If the toggle link, the "S" shaped part that hangs from the toggle assy and hooks to the mainspring is bent out of shape, it could prevent return travel.
gunbugs is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to gunbugs for your post:
Old 09-06-2021, 12:06 AM   #6
Military Engineer
User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 41
Thanks: 9
Thanked 37 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spangy View Post
22 is the normal coil count for a mainspring. Before I started shaving metal I would exhaust all other avenues.

"There is a little resistance to the toggle train going back into the fork when I reassemble. It's always been that way, but never given me the issue before."

The only resistance one would normally feel would be when the breach bolt engaged the ejector spring when reassembling. Anything above that and I would start to think about the re-barrel warping or altering the fork positions. Grab a caliper and measure the distance between the forks to check for warped forks all along the forks front to back. It should be around .51" give or take .005" but most importantly they should be the same distance all along the forks, front, middle and back, any noticeable distance change would indicate a warped or 'bent' fork. You also must check the vertical orientation but if it was a vertical aberration you would most likely notice that the axle pin would not fit smoothly.

Again though, I would start with the mainspring.

Good luck Mark.
Spangy,

I measured and it is indeed .51. to be exact the maximum "run out", to incorrectly use a machining term, is about .005" or so, so by your numbers it is within spec. Axle pin goes in and out freely.

I'm going to order up a Wolff Gunspring kit tomorrow morning.
Military Engineer is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Military Engineer for your post:
Old 09-06-2021, 12:36 AM   #7
G.T.
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chandler Arizona
Posts: 3,540
Thanks: 1,342
Thanked 3,735 Times in 1,019 Posts
Smile Barking, trees, and other distractions?

Hi to all! Without the pistol in hand, I'm not in any position to bark! But I can at least whine a little that maybe on the mainspring as being the issue, you're barking up the wrong tree?....... Even a pooched out, clipped .30 luger mainsprings will initiate closure from the full tension position! The only thing it won't do, is fully close?
So, in the event that the toggle stays stuck in the full travel position, it has to be an interference or lack of available tolerance at that position? So, here's the protocol for that check. First, strip the upper barreled receiver completely. Completely strip the breechblock as well. Now, if you install just the stripped breechblock, it should slide freely from front to back without ANY interference! Any felt interference will be multiplied when operating dynamically.
The measurement between the forks should be .715" ... Also, with a caliper, measure across the chamber, and also measure across the rear receiver forks, and they should be the same.. .939" usually? With the rear main pin installed, and just the breechblock in the receiver, put the abbreviated top end back on the frame, and close the take down lever. Now, everything, the receiver, the breechblock, and the the receiver with the breechblock installed in the frame should slide effortlessly back and forth.. Somewhere in all this, you will find the issue. I'm still betting on a coke bottle shaped crushed or twisted receiver fork will be the culprit??? BTW, try the receiver assembly on a known working Luger? That will tell you a lot as well... best of luck, til...lat'r....GT....
G.T. is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to G.T. for your post:
Unread 09-06-2021, 04:11 AM   #8
Military Engineer
User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 41
Thanks: 9
Thanked 37 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G.T. View Post
Hi to all! Without the pistol in hand, I'm not in any position to bark! But I can at least whine a little that maybe on the mainspring as being the issue, you're barking up the wrong tree?....... Even a pooched out, clipped .30 luger mainsprings will initiate closure from the full tension position! The only thing it won't do, is fully close?
So, in the event that the toggle stays stuck in the full travel position, it has to be an interference or lack of available tolerance at that position? So, here's the protocol for that check. First, strip the upper barreled receiver completely. Completely strip the breechblock as well. Now, if you install just the stripped breechblock, it should slide freely from front to back without ANY interference! Any felt interference will be multiplied when operating dynamically.
The measurement between the forks should be .715" ... Also, with a caliper, measure across the chamber, and also measure across the rear receiver forks, and they should be the same.. .939" usually? With the rear main pin installed, and just the breechblock in the receiver, put the abbreviated top end back on the frame, and close the take down lever. Now, everything, the receiver, the breechblock, and the the receiver with the breechblock installed in the frame should slide effortlessly back and forth.. Somewhere in all this, you will find the issue. I'm still betting on a coke bottle shaped crushed or twisted receiver fork will be the culprit??? BTW, try the receiver assembly on a known working Luger? That will tell you a lot as well... best of luck, til...lat'r....GT....
I'm going to actually do the full strip and see, as you describe. The forks are parallell, by measurement (< .005") and are the same measurement at the chamber and the full travel position.

I'm going to try the springs and a full cleaning including the grooves using things like tiny picks just to make sure I don't have dirt built up in the tiniest spots.

I'll pull out my WW2 Luger and see if it does work. I just know that Lugers are hand fitted, so i wanted to limit the "fitted parts" from complicating the issue across two pistols that are 20+ years apart.
Military Engineer is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Military Engineer for your post:
Unread 09-06-2021, 02:11 PM   #9
G.T.
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chandler Arizona
Posts: 3,540
Thanks: 1,342
Thanked 3,735 Times in 1,019 Posts
Default problem part!

Hi Mark, it will be interesting to know what is causing the issue? BTW, I have a ton of toggle train parts should you need something to replace or even a part just to try... let us know... best, til...lat'r....GT
G.T. is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to G.T. for your post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com