![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
![]() |
#1 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: TN
Posts: 297
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Doug,
IMHO once a pistol is altered by changing the proofing (engraving) it becomes a fake. After all what else has been changed or engraved? My flame for this hobby is rapidly being extinguished by this type, and acceptance of a faked pistol. Now, having said that I feel a whee bit better. If you laid pistol S/N 119a next to pistol S/N 121a you would have a hard time explaining some of the apparent differences. I feel sorry for the person that might buy it several years from now. I have always wondered why some of the K-dates I see restored have such prominent acceptance proofing. Now I know it has been fooled with (engraved). Of the five K-dates I have none of them have such proniment proofing as this pistol 119a. 119a pistol now goes on my list as a fake! I hope someone else agrees with this opinion, if not this hobby has gone to hell in a hand basket! Best Regards, ToggleTop-Chester Volz
__________________
************************* ***ToggleTop************** *Just*Happen*To*Love*Lugers* ************************* |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|