Machining marks

Garfield · 09-04-2002, 11:51 PM

Toggletop:

I have an early 1940-42 and will agree that the milling marks in the area of the "ears" are minimal, however, there is a difference between "minimal" and "no-existant" as the pics of Kidvett's appear to illustrate.

Kidvett: Before you dump your pistol, I'd have a disinterested person who has some knowledge take a look at your pistol. I might be allright. Pictures are nice, however, as John S has so grafically demonstrated, with enhancements, etc., things appear not as they exist.

Good Luck

09-04-2002, 11:51 PM	#14
Garfield User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: A little SE of Nome Posts: 239 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Toggletop: I have an early 1940-42 and will agree that the milling marks in the area of the "ears" are minimal, however, there is a difference between "minimal" and "no-existant" as the pics of Kidvett's appear to illustrate. Kidvett: Before you dump your pistol, I'd have a disinterested person who has some knowledge take a look at your pistol. I might be allright. Pictures are nice, however, as John S has so grafically demonstrated, with enhancements, etc., things appear not as they exist. Good Luck