LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > New Collectors Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 06-25-2019, 07:37 AM   #1
George Anderson
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 3,592
Thanks: 1,773
Thanked 2,531 Times in 788 Posts
Default

I believe you have a very rare magazine for a 1944 dated Krieghoff. The "122" on the spine is the last three digits of the pistol's serial number.
George Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 9 members says Thank You to George Anderson for your post:
Unread 06-25-2019, 09:48 AM   #2
guns3545
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 438
Thanks: 661
Thanked 493 Times in 219 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George Anderson View Post
I believe you have a very rare magazine for a 1944 dated Krieghoff. The "122" on the spine is the last three digits of the pistol's serial number.
Marc,

I agree with George.

I believe if you look closely, you will find that the marking is pantographed not stamped. It probably belonged to 1944 HK SN 11122.

At one time I owned SN 11244 and it had the identical type magazine and font style and marking.

The only thing that works against this theory is that the early 11000 serial numbers at HK were mainly 1940 dated. On the other hand, HK were notoriously bad at FIFO serialization and there are numerous examples of SNs being produced non-sequentially. especially in the 1940s , i.e. after the initial order for 10,000 was shipped.

An example; my 1943 HK had a higher SN than my 1944.

And, BTW, your mag is in remarkably good condition.

John
guns3545 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 5 members says Thank You to guns3545 for your post:
Unread 06-25-2019, 10:44 AM   #3
G.T.
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chandler Arizona
Posts: 3,528
Thanks: 1,334
Thanked 3,711 Times in 1,014 Posts
Default Makes sense to me as well!

When posting previously, I obviously forgot all about Krieghoff? It makes perfect sense, and as some members have actually had examples that match the description of your magazine, it is most likely a sure thing! Congrats! ... Now, you have only to find a late production Krieghoff P.08 with that serial number and you're in business...... Great mag, and as mentioned before, screamer condition.... best to all, til….lat'r….GT ….
G.T. is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to G.T. for your post:
Unread 12-18-2020, 01:16 PM   #4
1933 FORD NUT
User
 
1933 FORD NUT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: WI
Posts: 88
Thanks: 3
Thanked 70 Times in 37 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guns3545 View Post
Marc,

I agree with George.

I believe if you look closely, you will find that the marking is pantographed not stamped. It probably belonged to 1944 HK SN 11122.

At one time I owned SN 11244 and it had the identical type magazine and font style and marking.

The only thing that works against this theory is that the early 11000 serial numbers at HK were mainly 1940 dated. On the other hand, HK were notoriously bad at FIFO serialization and there are numerous examples of SNs being produced non-sequentially. especially in the 1940s , i.e. after the initial order for 10,000 was shipped.

An example; my 1943 HK had a higher SN than my 1944.

And, BTW, your mag is in remarkably good condition.

John
Agree with this and others .

These late mags can also be found totally un-marked with plastic or aluminum bases .

Definately not common and congrats !!

Mind if I use the pic of the serial in a photo study ?
Old thread but maybe you still watch ?

FWIW my 1943 has a higher serial than my old 1944 like Johns were.
1933 FORD NUT is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-18-2020, 08:29 PM   #5
Mutts
User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 13
Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1933 FORD NUT View Post
Agree with this and others .

These late mags can also be found totally un-marked with plastic or aluminum bases .

Definately not common and congrats !!

Mind if I use the pic of the serial in a photo study ?
Old thread but maybe you still watch ?

FWIW my 1943 has a higher serial than my old 1944 like Johns were.
No problem. Use pics at will! Full speed ahead.
Mutts is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com