![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
#61 |
|
User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,681
Thanks: 1,443
Thanked 4,356 Times in 2,041 Posts
|
Pictures are better, but they lack detail when enlarged to try to "see" what the upper center marking might be.
Need to take the picture with more "active" pixels- just not enough detail there. Here is best I could do with data in the picture.
__________________
03man(Don Voigt); Luger student and collector. Looking for DWM side plate: 69 ; Dreyse 1907 pistol K.S. Gendarmerie |
|
|
|
| The following member says Thank You to DonVoigt for your post: |
|
|
#62 |
|
User
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 544
Thanks: 194
Thanked 490 Times in 251 Posts
|
A nice photo has arrived!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
User
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Centeral Texas
Posts: 28
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Grand daughter took pic with her fancy phone. I hope this is what you are looking far.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
User
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 544
Thanks: 194
Thanked 490 Times in 251 Posts
|
Bump - hoping someone will comment on the markings now that we finally have a good photo. Even if the comment is that the markings are unknown/mean nothing, that's helpful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,681
Thanks: 1,443
Thanked 4,356 Times in 2,041 Posts
|
Quote:
The "odd" shape looks like an "arrowhead" but may be a "barred shield". Neither fits the observed characteristics of the frame. I don't know what the frame is, but it is not a post 1914 DWM, for two reasons, it does not have an "N" or circled "N" in the well, and it has a grip safety. The serial number of 356a, also is an enigma- which should be a military number. I am mystified and bumfuzzled.
__________________
03man(Don Voigt); Luger student and collector. Looking for DWM side plate: 69 ; Dreyse 1907 pistol K.S. Gendarmerie |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
User
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Centeral Texas
Posts: 28
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Found 3 more stamps on pistol. 1 in rear of lower frame and 2 real small ones on upper receiver. Will try to send pic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
User
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Centeral Texas
Posts: 28
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
4 scales did you get the last 3 pic sent today?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
User
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 544
Thanks: 194
Thanked 490 Times in 251 Posts
|
Three more also of solid quality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,681
Thanks: 1,443
Thanked 4,356 Times in 2,041 Posts
|
I believe we have established that the receiver is DWM.
It is the vintage of the frame that remains unknown, these last pictures don't help.
__________________
03man(Don Voigt); Luger student and collector. Looking for DWM side plate: 69 ; Dreyse 1907 pistol K.S. Gendarmerie |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
User
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Centeral Texas
Posts: 28
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
How do you determine the vintage of the frame?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
User
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 544
Thanks: 194
Thanked 490 Times in 251 Posts
|
A few years back I saw a similar pistol on Simpson's site. It had a DWM military barrel extension with the date over the chamber, but a Swiss .30 caliber 4.75" barrel. It was a quality rework, very nice and offered for around $1,400. I remember the pistol well because I strong considered purchasing it. I forget who I spoke to at Simpson but they said they see a few like that from time to time, which they defined as Swiss re-works of Imperial militaries that were then sold into the Swiss commercial market post WWI. I found their explanation and the pistol both fascinating and sort of regret not getting it. Given Ron's comments at post #36, absent other information to the contrary I have to wonder if this may be another example of the type.
Determining frame vintage requires real expertise. If you compare Ron's post #36 in this thread to this tutorial on frames http://luger.gunboards.com/showthrea...Frame-Tutorial that will enlighten on some of the characteristics to consider. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|