![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Lifer X5
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: texas
Posts: 708
Thanks: 87
Thanked 522 Times in 201 Posts
|
![]()
not intending to be a smart...."because Ed wrote the book.."note his authorship in his header...he has infinite details on this subject....Tom
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Lifetime Forum
Patron Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska. Home of the best moose.
Posts: 672
Thanks: 371
Thanked 1,202 Times in 407 Posts
|
![]()
To give a straightforward answer, The Mauser banner on the toggle in conjunction with the 1939 date, plus the sear safety, (the little flat spring over the top of the sideplate), plus the "Eagle L" proof on the right of the receiver. All that together makes it a police issue gun. I would note that the magazine appears incorrect for that particular gun, at first glance.
|
![]() |
![]() |
The following 2 members says Thank You to gunbugs for your post: |
![]() |
#3 | |
User
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 13
Thanks: 7
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Are the the magazines numbered to the pistol? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 13
Thanks: 7
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Certainly not questioning anyone’s knowledge or opinion. We were looking in a gun value book, my friend had, and it listed a number of possibilities that this pistol could have fallen under, as made by Mauser. I am just trying to educate my self on how it is dertetmined to be a banner police, ie finish, markings, date.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
User
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southwest Virginia
Posts: 391
Thanks: 802
Thanked 583 Times in 211 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
John 8:32 reive (riːv) vb (Military) (intr) dialect Scot and Northern English to go on a plundering raid [variant of reave] ˈreiver n e.g., " Some view the Border Reivers as loveable rogues." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|