Collecting Shooters Shameful? Opinion/poll

alvin · 02-26-2017, 08:28 PM

Actually, in gun collecting world, the highest realm is acquiring collectible at shooter's cost. If that cannot be done easily (for obvious reason), at least, should avoid acquiring shooter at collectible's cost. Regarding regular buying shooters as shooters, collectibles as collectibles, that's just personal taste.

{{{ However, never sell a shooter as a collectible, buyer will get mad on you for understandable reason. That's also moral standard issue. To sell a collectible as shooter or not, that's up to you }}}

For shooter Luger (or other types), I cannot think needing many them. One should be enough. No need to acquire a few of those. If do have interest on another shooter, better sell the current one to finance the next one.

02-26-2017, 08:28 PM	#6
alvin User Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: US Posts: 3,843 Thanks: 132 Thanked 729 Times in 438 Posts	Actually, in gun collecting world, the highest realm is acquiring collectible at shooter's cost. If that cannot be done easily (for obvious reason), at least, should avoid acquiring shooter at collectible's cost. Regarding regular buying shooters as shooters, collectibles as collectibles, that's just personal taste. {{{ However, never sell a shooter as a collectible, buyer will get mad on you for understandable reason. That's also moral standard issue. To sell a collectible as shooter or not, that's up to you }}} For shooter Luger (or other types), I cannot think needing many them. One should be enough. No need to acquire a few of those. If do have interest on another shooter, better sell the current one to finance the next one.