![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
![]() |
#2 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Newburgh,IN
Posts: 796
Thanks: 403
Thanked 639 Times in 338 Posts
|
![]()
Poker, welcome!
As mentioned, the gun was poorly refinished and there is evidence of corrosion. This one is not very good for an investment. But, could be good for a shooter. The photos don't reveal much more information. Unless it is extremely inexpensive, find and buy a better Luger. Please look at the FAQ section of this forum for very helpful information.
__________________
“God created war so that Americans would learn geography.” ― Mark Twain |
![]() |
![]() |
The following 3 members says Thank You to Eugen for your post: |
![]() |
#3 |
User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 2,679
Thanked 930 Times in 509 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 2,679
Thanked 930 Times in 509 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Az.
Posts: 2,308
Thanks: 2,737
Thanked 993 Times in 729 Posts
|
![]()
In my opinion, for a first Luger, this would not be the one. There has been/still is, a lot of corrosion and pitting and we can not see the insides of the Luger. I would look elsewhere.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|