Interesting story in 1945

Jan C Still · 06-23-2002, 03:38 PM

Wes
in defense of Reinhard's article in DWJ.

You state that Reinhards article is a "lot of nothing", "irresponsable" and"sensational" I would suggest that it is a reflection of the information supplied by the seller. Thus far the seller has supplied such statements as "the finest historic firearm ever discovered", "original" and "not a Krausewerke". These are unverified/undocumented seller statemants.

Of coarse Reinhard's article does not include the undocumentated seller hype. This leaves little to report("a lot of nothing") This objective and accurate article is just what Reinhard and DWJ intended.
Jan C. Still

06-23-2002, 03:38 PM	#19
Jan C Still User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Box 240188, Douglas, Alaska, 99824 Posts: 463 Thanks: 0 Thanked 52 Times in 32 Posts	Wes in defense of Reinhard's article in DWJ. You state that Reinhards article is a "lot of nothing", "irresponsable" and"sensational" I would suggest that it is a reflection of the information supplied by the seller. Thus far the seller has supplied such statements as "the finest historic firearm ever discovered", "original" and "not a Krausewerke". These are unverified/undocumented seller statemants. Of coarse Reinhard's article does not include the undocumentated seller hype. This leaves little to report("a lot of nothing") This objective and accurate article is just what Reinhard and DWJ intended. Jan C. Still