LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Early Lugers (1900-1906)

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 10-12-2003, 05:52 PM   #11
Dean
User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 132
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post

Thanks Ron, You just saved me alot of headache.

However, Ignoring the "return to battery" problem, If the mass of the new barrel is at issue would not a ligher recoil spring be in order?

I think the "return to battery" problem comes about because the weight of the barrel causes a torque on the frame rails, thus adding extra friction to the motion.

I can think of a few ways to deal with this. Good lubrication, hone the frame rails, smooth the action up.

It's might be possible to add a lightly spring loaded roller in the forearm to push up on the bottom of the barrel and ease the torque on the rails. Granted, we no longer have a "full floating" barrel, but if it means that we can now have a carbine that is able to shoot regular ammo without cycling issue then it might be worth the small loss in accuracy.

I believe the above items can be addressed after the carbine is completed. Only after test firing the gun will I be able to evaluate these issues. To play it safe, I will install Wollfe's heaviest recoil spring and, if required, move to a lighter spring.
__________________
Carpe Diem, Parabellum
Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com