![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
#7 |
|
Super Moderator - Patron
LugerForum Life Patron Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,925
Thanks: 1,377
Thanked 3,140 Times in 1,520 Posts
|
There is a followup at the NRA site with a recommended action to take now:
https://www.nraila.org/articles/2015...related-speech I wrote them with this: (Feel free to copy as approprite... the address and required subject line is below... ) Addressed to: DDTCPublicComments@state.gov Subject: ITAR Amendment—Revisions to Definitions; Data Transmission and Storage. As a nationally certified firearms safety instructor and North Carolina state DOJ certified CCH instructor, I am very concerned about the State Department's intent to reinterpret the ITAR regulations to inhibit or prohibit online Internet based discussion of firearms or related ammunition. At a minimum, specifications, techniques and designs which are related to Gun Control Act regulated products and services should be considered as exempt from any ITAR restrictions. Gunsmiths, manufacturers, re-loaders, and do-it-yourselfers could all find themselves muzzled under the rule and unable to distribute or obtain the information they rely on to conduct these activities in a safe manner. Prior restraints of the sort contemplated by this regulation are among the most disfavored regulations of speech under First Amendment case law. Regulation of this speech is a clear infringement of a citizen's rights as recognized and protected from government interference by our Federal constitution's Second Amendment. I urge you to cease further efforts in this area.
__________________
- Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war. |
|
|
|
| The following 7 members says Thank You to mrerick for your post: |
|
|