LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > Off Topic & Other Firearms

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 05-22-2015, 04:09 PM   #1
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,138 Times in 2,176 Posts
Default

Can we try this one? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6IDbi3wbRg
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	cat 001.jpg
Views:	93
Size:	190.4 KB
ID:	49031  

cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-22-2015, 04:41 PM   #2
danielsand
User
 
danielsand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 137
Thanks: 52
Thanked 100 Times in 43 Posts
Default

Now that you all informed yourselves about the M48 (or M48A), you know how nice these rifles are. K98 is much sought by collectors (ones that collect German weapons exclusively), and clean specimens command pretty high price. M48 went up in price considerably in the last ten years or so, but it's still WAY cheaper than K98.

I purchased mine from a Phoenix PD Sergeant in the condition I mentioned (practically NEW), for $160 back in 2007. Over the years I accumulated a sizable "collection" of the weapons that I was interested in. So in 2007 I decided to give my "collection" some kind of "theme", and since I've spent my childhood in Yugoslavia (already owned several Yugo weapons), I cleaned my safe of some weapons that "didn't fit" into my "theme", and concentrated on Yugo only. Naturally, the M48 was the #1 in the lineup, because it was the first weapon I've ever fired. In the late 90s I was in Bosnia and Croatia, and I used almost all of Yugo armament of that time, "in the field", so I was VERY familiar with all of them.

Some of the weapons I got rid of I will miss for a long time (G3, FAL, Uzi). But now my Yugo lineup consists of M57 pistol, M48, M59/66, M70B1, M70AB1, M72, M76, and M53.

There are still MANY more that "don't fit" into the Yugo theme, but I am emotionally attached to them, and they are staying with me forever.
danielsand is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-22-2015, 06:48 PM   #3
danielsand
User
 
danielsand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 137
Thanks: 52
Thanked 100 Times in 43 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cirelaw View Post

I watched this video you posted, and the guy in it is NOT too familiar withe this system. I'll explain.

The "wing" at the end of the bolt he demonstrates to be at "safety on" position in the VERTICAL orientation. This is INCORRECT!

When the "wing" is on the left, the rifle is ready to fire. When it's fully to the right, the rife is "on safe". The vertical position is used ONLY for dis assembly of the bolt! When this wing is vertical, the bolt is removed from the rifle (magazine is empty!!), and in this position (and this position only), the bolt body can be separated from the bolt "head" by depressing the plunger,visible at the "collar". Once the bolt body is separated, the firing pin is placed into the metal "ring" on the stock (on K98), the wing is forced downward with the thumb (against the spring), and the firing pin can be removed, by turning the connector 90 degrees. On M48, the tip of the firing pin is placed into the nut of the crossbolt, and treated the same way (M48 does not have the metal "ring" imbeded into the stock.

Bottom line,.....the rifle is NOT safe with the wing vertical!! The wing should NEVER (as in never-ever) be in the vertical position if the rifle has a round in the chamber. If dropped it can fire.

Be safe folks. This disassembly procedure was drilled into me in the elementary school in Belgrade, back in 1968.
danielsand is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to danielsand for your post:
Unread 05-23-2015, 05:18 AM   #4
Sergio Natali
User
 
Sergio Natali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere in Northern Italy
Posts: 2,646
Thanks: 1,087
Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,007 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by danielsand View Post
I watched this video you posted, and the guy in it is NOT too familiar withe this system. I'll explain.

The "wing" at the end of the bolt he demonstrates to be at "safety on" position in the VERTICAL orientation. This is INCORRECT!

When the "wing" is on the left, the rifle is ready to fire. When it's fully to the right, the rife is "on safe". The vertical position is used ONLY for dis assembly of the bolt! When this wing is vertical, the bolt is removed from the rifle (magazine is empty!!), and in this position (and this position only), the bolt body can be separated from the bolt "head" by depressing the plunger,visible at the "collar". Once the bolt body is separated, the firing pin is placed into the metal "ring" on the stock (on K98), the wing is forced downward with the thumb (against the spring), and the firing pin can be removed, by turning the connector 90 degrees. On M48, the tip of the firing pin is placed into the nut of the crossbolt, and treated the same way (M48 does not have the metal "ring" imbeded into the stock.

Bottom line,.....the rifle is NOT safe with the wing vertical!! The wing should NEVER (as in never-ever) be in the vertical position if the rifle has a round in the chamber. If dropped it can fire.

Be safe folks. This disassembly procedure was drilled into me in the elementary school in Belgrade, back in 1968.


Allright, all correct, but remember that Hickock45, that you surely know, is an icon for many of us.




Sergio
__________________
"Originality can't be restored and should be at the top of any collector's priority list.
Sergio Natali is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-23-2015, 08:05 AM   #5
danielsand
User
 
danielsand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 137
Thanks: 52
Thanked 100 Times in 43 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by luger.parabellum View Post
Allright, all correct, but remember that Hickock45, that you surely know, is an icon for many of us.




Sergio
Sorry. I didn't know of his "iconic status". I've never seen the guy before. Once in a while I run into a video on Youtube (I don't go there often) where someone demonstrates something completely wrong (mechanical stuff usually).

I would think that if one goes through the trouble of producing the video, one would research the subject prior to filming. There is no problem if someone claiming to be "an expert" demonstrates a repair on a vintage Jaguar (example). But unsafe handling of a weapon, is a whole different story.

Again,....I'm sorry, but safety in handling the weapons was always a TOP priority during my schooling.
danielsand is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to danielsand for your post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com