LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > Shooting and Reloading

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 02-24-2015, 02:32 AM   #9
Sieger
User
 
Sieger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,579
Thanks: 2,144
Thanked 402 Times in 251 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schutzenbob View Post
I think something got lost along the way......I thought the question was about the excessive amount of twist that was used in Luger barrels; a 30 caliber barrel with a pitch of 1-10 inches will happily stabilize a 180 grain bullet.

As an example I plugged the specs from a Lyman/Ideal #311227 lead bullet into the Greenhill Formula to determine the twist necessary to stabilize such a bullet; Diameter .312, Length .538, Approximate velocity 1,200, Material lead/tin. What I got was a pitch of 1 turn in 23 inches. Now.....since luger barrels have about twice the necessary pitch, I have to wonder why? Possibility #1 Did DWM cut down rifle barrel blanks to make the pistol barrels? Possibility #2 DWM's rifling machines were not adjustable and the pitch was set for rifle barrels? Again ?quien sabe?

inputs
bullet length = .538
bullet diameter = .312
muzzle velocity fps = 1,200
bullet SG lead = 11.3

bullet SG values: 11.3 lead
8.9 copper
8.5 brass
7.8 steel

output = 1 turn in 23"

Notes

The classic Greenhill equation is

T' = 150 / L'

where the twist and the bullet length are in calibers. Removing bullet diameter from twist and length gives the equation often found:

T = 150 * D^2 / L

The Greenhill equation includes no term for muzzle velocity, and several sources suggest replacing the 150 with 180 for muzzle velocities over 2800 fps. Increasing muzzle velocity increases bullet spin, and spin provides the stability.

T = 3.5 * V^0.5 * D^2 / L

At 2800 fps, this equation is equivalent to using 185 in the Greenhill equation, and at 1840 fps, this equation is the same as Greenhill's.
Hi,

Thanks for your post, as I always really appreciate a thorough technical analysis of a given topic!

Let's stop guessing.

Yes, the 7.65x53mm DWM '98s did, indeed, have a twist of 1 in 9.84, 250mm. These shot bullets weighing 154 grains at 2,755 fps.

The original DWM round nose Parabellum bullet was .59055 inches, 15mm, in length, but was not made of lead; rather, it had a lead core and a nickel alloy jacket.

As previously mentioned, the 9mm Luger barrels have exactly the same twist.

Over-spun or not, when loaded to original DWM specs, both the 7.65mm and 9mm Parabellums can be incredibly accurate cartridges when shot through Lugers.

Whatever the case regarding the adjustability of their rifling machinery, DWM produced some excellent quality pistols that shot quite accurately.

It may mean something that over-spun bullets have better terminal affect when creating wound channels.


Sieger
Sieger is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Sieger for your post:
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com