mauser 42 rig

DavidJayUden · 08-13-2014, 12:54 PM

Norm:
The condition of the inside of the tool flap just looks too new, unused. Also the thickness of the main closure strap looks suspect. But seeing that the tool was "also marked 42" brought everything into suspicion, and here weren't enough good photos to go to work on the gun, mags, or tool. We just need more photos.
I'm interested to hear Jerry weigh in on the holster.
dju

08-13-2014, 12:54 PM	#12
DavidJayUden Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 4,047 Thanks: 578 Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts	Norm: The condition of the inside of the tool flap just looks too new, unused. Also the thickness of the main closure strap looks suspect. But seeing that the tool was "also marked 42" brought everything into suspicion, and here weren't enough good photos to go to work on the gun, mags, or tool. We just need more photos. I'm interested to hear Jerry weigh in on the holster. dju