![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
#5 | |
|
User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,579
Thanks: 2,154
Thanked 402 Times in 251 Posts
|
Quote:
The Nambu is totally a handloading proposition, and, in my experienced opinion, so is the Luger. Do you handload? If not, do you know someone who does? The Nambu isn't as hard to get to operate properly as a Luger, but there are certain parameters to be followed. I really enjoyed shooting my Nambus, back in the day, and will be shooting them more frequently, now that others have expressed an interest and have reignited mine. Back in the late 1970s, when I first started collecting Nambus, nobody liked them and they were dirt cheap. One good reason for this was the lack of readily available commercial ammo. Fast forward 40 years, and there is, at least, some interest in collecting them, but still no readily available commercial ammo to shoot through them. Really, I feel the Nambu T-14 is of excellent design, borrowing the lower from the Luger and the upper from the Mauser C-96. It is true that the safety could have easily been relocated for easier use and a simple hold-open devise designed and added to round out the design of the T-14 a bit, but, this wasn't the case. Perhaps, had the Japanese simply adopted the 9mm Parabellum cartridge in their new T-14, the shooting world would have been a different place. Sieger PS: The feeding problem, with your Nambu, sounds like a typical cartridge O.A.L. problem to me. Original O.A.L. was at 31.5mm (1.24 inches). |
|
|
|
|
|
|