LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > All P-08 Military Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 10-22-2013, 04:16 AM   #1
Dirty Dave
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Newbie with a DWM artillery

Hello out there. Just acquired a DWM 1916 artillery model. Googled "DWM artillery luger", scrolled to images. Did this because my side plate doesn't match. At 1st observation, there is NO number. Took side plate off, found non matching # on the bottom edge of side plate. I saw images with no visible # on side of plate & some with # that is visible. What is it supposed to be & what model is mine from with the # on the bottom edge? THANKS!
Dirty Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-22-2013, 08:40 AM   #2
ithacaartist
Twice a Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
ithacaartist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Atop the highest hill in Schuyler County NY
Posts: 3,324
Thanks: 7,204
Thanked 2,538 Times in 1,350 Posts
Default

Welcome to the forum, Dave. I think I know your cousin "Filthy Frank".

Your side plate may have been replaced, but it might also be correct.

The side plate ion your Artie is numbered in the commercial style, according to your description of the number's location. Military style displays all the secondary serial numbers right on the faces of the parts that have been stamped, commercial style numbers are stamped more discreetly--back and bottom.

Some pics of your gun would help us figure out what it is, when made, and perhaps a bit of history for it...depending. Take pics in subdued natural light, as in the shade, outdoors, no direct sun. Show all proofs, numbers, etc. Full left, right, bottom , and top would give us a place to start.

We'll see if yours is a shooter, which you will enjoy, or a collectable example to be preserved and treasured--in which case you'll need to pick up another Luger to actually shoot. This, you'll find, will not be a problem because the Parabellum pistol is the ultimate "potato chip" gun--can't eat just one--and odds are, you'll acquire more!

David Parker
__________________
"... Liberty is the seed and soil, the air and light, the dew and rain of progress, love and joy."-- Robert Greene Ingersoll 1894
ithacaartist is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-22-2013, 08:46 AM   #3
DavidJayUden
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
Default

DD:
Welcome.
The side plate you have is marked in the commercial fashion. There were some commercial artilleries, but I don't recall if they were completely marked in the commercial fashion. SSSSSSSooooooooo........
Pictures please and we will clear this up.
dju
DavidJayUden is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-22-2013, 07:10 PM   #4
Dirty Dave
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks! I'll get some pics in here Saturday. It's after dark when I get home. Think the light would be better outside on Saturday. What you folks call the secondary numbers, are boldly visible everywhere but the side plate (just like on my s/42 ). Re: "potatoe chip" comment. Yeah....I've got 2 of these things now....MADNESS! The S/42 shoots like a dream. Not so with this one. I know it cycles because after I fire a round, the next sound is "click". The empty is still there. Manually pulling toggle brings it out. Extractor is as good as the one in the S/42, however spring feels weak compared to extractor spring in S/42. Sooo ordered new springs from Wolff today. Tried Winchester white box loads as well as personal defense stuff. No difference. Next question is why the bolt didn't try to pick up next round from the mag & cause a jam??? Oh well...one issue at a time. Thanks again guys!
Dirty Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-22-2013, 08:35 PM   #5
Tony Min
User
 
Tony Min's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 169
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 14 Posts
Default

Might be weak magazine spring. Did you try the mag from your other Luger?
Tony Min is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-22-2013, 09:44 PM   #6
Edward Tinker
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer
LugerForum
Patron
 
Edward Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,926
Thanks: 2,014
Thanked 4,523 Times in 2,089 Posts
Default

if its dated 1916, then it should be marked in the military manner - I think - but could be wrong, that only commercial artillery's were made post war
__________________
Edward Tinker
************
Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers
Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV

Edward Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Edward Tinker for your post:
Unread 10-22-2013, 10:19 PM   #7
Ron Wood
Moderator
2010 LugerForum
Patron
 
Ron Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,005
Thanks: 1,087
Thanked 5,139 Times in 1,689 Posts
Default

You aren't wrong Ed.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction
Ron Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-22-2013, 11:13 PM   #8
DavidJayUden
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
Default

Good point. Thanks Ed.
DavidJayUden is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com