1917 DWM Luger, Artillery style xx62e

Ron Wood · 09-03-2012, 06:11 PM

I probably should add a nuance of explanation to my former statement. It is not the owning of a stock by itself that is illegal, it is the possession of a stock without having a correct corresponding Luger if you also own any Luger(s) for which the stock is not correct. It is the improper combination of stock and gun that is illegal, not the stock per se. You have to have a gun that is correct for the stock to qualify for the exemption if you own other Lugers that do not qualify…period.

09-03-2012, 06:11 PM	#18
Ron Wood Moderator 2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso Posts: 7,040 Thanks: 1,106 Thanked 5,256 Times in 1,724 Posts	I probably should add a nuance of explanation to my former statement. It is not the owning of a stock by itself that is illegal, it is the possession of a stock *without having a correct corresponding Luger* if you *also own any Luger(s) for which the stock is not correct*. It is the improper combination of stock and gun that is illegal, not the stock per se. You have to have a gun that is correct for the stock to qualify for the exemption if you own other Lugers that do not qualify…period. __________________ If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction