LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Artillery Lugers

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 09-03-2012, 10:57 AM   #6
tx_oil
User
 
tx_oil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 61
Thanks: 8
Thanked 18 Times in 13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidJayUden View Post
Ed:
I respectfully disagree. Back in the day of the auto sears for the AR15, if you had one auto sear (or the bolt/carrier/trigger parts for the M16) AND you also had in your possession an AR15, it was "slap the cuffs on" time. The parts did not have to be on the gun.
So, my rationale that owning an artillery stock, not owning a pistol that it is legal on, would be as heinous in the eyes of the BATF.
It's probably academic, but that is one group that I sincerely hope to never do business with.
dju
The BATFE defines this as 'constructive intent', i.e, owning all the parts necessary to 'construct' a class III item. This is a completely different issue from owning a stock. Be aware, however, that in the eyes of the BATFE, an 18" shoelace is also considered a 'machine gun' and is prohibited.. because said shoelace can be used to bumpfire a semi-auto. Logic flies out the wndow when the alphabet boys get involved...
__________________
Invest in precious metals: Lead, Brass and Primers
tx_oil is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com