![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Retired to Naples, FL.
Posts: 497
Thanks: 110
Thanked 155 Times in 97 Posts
|
i would not hesitate to pay $ 250 for that magazine if i ran across it at a gun show table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Kaufman County, Texas
Posts: 48
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Thanks Ben,
that is encouraging to hear. It makes up for all the times that I have spent too much. I am not really much of a collector but rather a shooter that enjoys accumulating high quality guns and accessories. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chandler Arizona
Posts: 3,540
Thanks: 1,342
Thanked 3,735 Times in 1,019 Posts
|
hello to all.... I've looked at the pic's really closely... and to be truthful, I really can't tell.... If it came down to what i think from what i see... I believe the magazine bottom to be a replacement at probably some early stage of it's life... I'm basing this opinion on just a very few observations... One, the style of the radius on the knobs appears as neither DWM or Erfurt... kind of inbetween... two, the fit to the shell is not good either in the front spine area, (common,) or the rear spine area, (Not common) but most importantily, the side grain in just about every original manufacture magazine bottom, whether DWM or Erfurt, slants to the rear approx. 30 to 45 degrees... this one would appear vertical..??... I'm not making any conclusion, because there was a huge range of variance... but those are the things i see that are glaring...
....Best to all, til...lat;'r...GT
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|